↑ Up

Lash---1.13.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Lash---1.13
% Problem  : SYO360^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  9 03:23:18 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_a,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(ty_j,type,
    j: a > a ).

thf(ty_f,type,
    f: ( a > a ) > a > a ).

thf(ty_eigen__0,type,
    eigen__0: a ).

thf(ty_g,type,
    g: ( a > a ) > a > a ).

thf(ty_h,type,
    h: a > a ).

thf(sP1,plain,
    ( sP1
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( h @ X1 )
        = ( j @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).

thf(sP2,plain,
    ( sP2
  <=> ( ( g @ h @ eigen__0 )
      = ( g @ j @ eigen__0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).

thf(sP3,plain,
    ( sP3
  <=> $false ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).

thf(sP4,plain,
    ( sP4
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( f @ h @ X1 )
        = ( g @ h @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).

thf(sP5,plain,
    ( sP5
  <=> ( ( f @ h @ eigen__0 )
      = ( g @ h @ eigen__0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).

thf(sP6,plain,
    ( sP6
  <=> ( h = j ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).

thf(sP7,plain,
    ( sP7
  <=> ! [X1: a > a,X2: a] :
        ( ( f @ X1 @ X2 )
        = ( g @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).

thf(sP8,plain,
    ( sP8
  <=> ( ( f @ h @ eigen__0 )
      = ( g @ j @ eigen__0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).

thf(cEDEC1,conjecture,
    ( ~ ( sP7
       => ~ sP1 )
   => ( ( f @ h )
      = ( g @ j ) ) ) ).

thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( sP7
         => ~ sP1 )
     => ( ( f @ h )
        = ( g @ j ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cEDEC1]) ).

thf(h1,assumption,
    ~ ( sP7
     => ~ sP1 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h2,assumption,
    ( ( f @ h )
   != ( g @ j ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h3,assumption,
    sP7,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h4,assumption,
    sP1,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h5,assumption,
    ~ ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( f @ h @ X1 )
        = ( g @ j @ X1 ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h6,assumption,
    ~ sP8,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(1,plain,
    ( sP6
    | ~ sP1 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(2,plain,
    ( sP2
    | sP3
    | ~ sP6 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ sP3,
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ~ sP5
    | sP8
    | sP3
    | ~ sP2 ),
    inference(confrontation_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ~ sP4
    | sP5 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ~ sP7
    | sP4 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h6,h5,h3,h4,h1,h2,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,h3,h4,h6]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h3,h4,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h6]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h5,7,h6]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_fe,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h4,h1,h2,h0]),tab_fe(discharge,[h5])],[h2,8,h5]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h2,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h3,h4])],[h1,9,h3,h4]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h1,h2])],[h0,10,h1,h2]) ).

thf(0,theorem,
    ( ~ ( sP7
       => ~ sP1 )
   => ( ( f @ h )
      = ( g @ j ) ) ),
    inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[11,h0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SYO360^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Oct  9 01:14:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.40  % Mode: cade22grackle2xfee4
% 0.21/0.40  % Steps: 56
% 0.21/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------