↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO362^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:39 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.87s 3.17s
% Output   : Refutation 7.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   26
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  138 (  31 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  329 (  54   ~;  55   |;   5   &; 196   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  19  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   49 (  49   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (  23   ^;  67   !;   0   ?;  93   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cK_decl,type,
    cK: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i > $o ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i > $o ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(sk6_decl,type,
    sk6: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ~ ! [B: $i > $o] :
              ( ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( A @ C )
                 => ( B @ C ) )
             => ! [C: $i] :
                  ( ( cK @ A @ C )
                 => ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ~ ( ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( sk1 @ B )
               => ( A @ B ) )
           => ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( cK @ sk1 @ B )
               => ( cK @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( cK @ sk1 @ A )
           => ( cK @ sk2 @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] :
        ( ( cK
          @ ^ [C: $i] :
              ( ( A @ C )
              | ( B @ C ) ) )
        = ( ^ [C: $i] :
              ( ( cK @ A @ C )
              | ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ) )
   => ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] :
        ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ C )
           => ( B @ C ) )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( cK @ A @ C )
           => ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM631A_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] :
          ( ( cK
            @ ^ [C: $i] :
                ( ( A @ C )
                | ( B @ C ) ) )
          = ( ^ [C: $i] :
                ( ( cK @ A @ C )
                | ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ) )
     => ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( A @ C )
             => ( B @ C ) )
         => ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( cK @ A @ C )
             => ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] :
          ( ( cK
            @ ^ [C: $i] :
                ( ( A @ C )
                | ( B @ C ) ) )
          = ( ^ [C: $i] :
                ( ( cK @ A @ C )
                | ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ) )
     => ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( A @ C )
             => ( B @ C ) )
         => ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( cK @ A @ C )
             => ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( cK
          @ ^ [D: $i] :
              ( ( A @ D )
              | ( B @ D ) ) )
        = ( ^ [D: $i] :
              ( ( cK @ A @ D )
              | ( cK @ B @ D ) ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( sk1 @ C )
        | ( sk2 @ C ) )
      & ( cK @ sk1 @ sk3 )
      & ~ ( cK @ sk2 @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    cK @ sk1 @ sk3,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cK
        @ ^ [C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ C )
            | ( B @ C ) ) )
      = ( ^ [C: $i] :
            ( ( cK @ A @ C )
            | ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cK
        @ ^ [C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ C )
            | ( B @ C ) ) )
      = ( ^ [C: $i] :
            ( ( cK @ A @ C )
            | ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( cK
        @ ^ [D: $i] :
            ( ( A @ D )
            | ( B @ D ) )
        @ C )
      = ( ( cK @ A @ C )
        | ( cK @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ~ ( cK @ sk2 @ sk3 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( ( cK @ A @ C )
          | ( cK @ B @ C ) )
      | ( ( cK
          @ ^ [D: $i] :
              ( ( A @ D )
              | ( B @ D ) )
          @ C )
       != ( cK @ sk2 @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[34,8]) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( ( cK @ A @ C )
          | ( cK @ B @ C ) )
      | ( ( ^ [D: $i] :
              ( ( A @ D )
              | ( B @ D ) ) )
       != sk2 )
      | ( C != sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[42]) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( cK @ A @ C )
        | ( ( ^ [D: $i] :
                ( ( A @ D )
                | ( B @ D ) ) )
         != sk2 )
        | ( C != sk3 ) )
      & ( ~ ( cK @ B @ C )
        | ( ( ^ [D: $i] :
                ( ( A @ D )
                | ( B @ D ) ) )
         != sk2 )
        | ( C != sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[43]) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( cK @ A @ C )
      | ( ( ^ [D: $i] :
              ( ( A @ D )
              | ( B @ D ) ) )
       != sk2 )
      | ( C != sk3 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[50]) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( cK @ A @ sk3 )
      | ( ( ^ [C: $i] :
              ( ( A @ C )
              | ( B @ C ) ) )
       != sk2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[51]) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( ^ [C: $i] :
              ( ( A @ C )
              | ( B @ C ) ) )
       != sk2 )
      | ( ( cK @ sk1 @ sk3 )
       != ( cK @ A @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,53]) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ^ [C: $i] :
              ( ( A @ C )
              | ( B @ C ) ) )
       != sk2 )
      | ( ( cK @ sk1 @ sk3 )
       != ( cK @ A @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [B: $i] :
            ( ( sk1 @ B )
            | ( A @ B ) ) )
     != sk2 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[63:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 )),bind(B,$thf( B ))]]) ).

thf(65,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [B: $i] :
            ( ( sk1 @ B )
            | ( A @ B ) ) )
     != sk2 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[64]) ).

thf(71,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( sk1 @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
        | ( A @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) )
     != ( sk2 @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[65]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( sk2 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( sk2 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(149,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( ( sk1 @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
          | ( A @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[71]) ).

thf(171,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
        | ~ ( sk2 @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( A @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
        | ~ ( sk2 @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[149]) ).

thf(172,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[171]) ).

thf(190,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk6 @ B ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( sk2 @ A )
       != ( sk2 @ ( sk6 @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[10,172]) ).

thf(191,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk6 @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ A )
       != ( sk2 @ ( sk6 @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[190]) ).

thf(192,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[191:[bind(A,$thf( sk6 @ C )),bind(B,$thf( C ))]]) ).

thf(194,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk6 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[192]) ).

thf(222,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $false
        | ( A @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) )
     != ( sk2 @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[71,194]) ).

thf(223,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( A @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
     != ( sk2 @ ( sk6 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[222]) ).

thf(253,plain,
    $false,
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[223:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO362^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:49:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.90/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.24/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (190ms). 
% 1.24/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.05/1.40  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.05/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.23/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.23/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.23/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.23/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.23/1.55  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 7.87/3.16  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 7.87/3.17  % Time passed: 2816ms (effective reasoning time: 2171ms)
% 7.87/3.17  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 7.87/3.17  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 7.87/3.17  % No. of inferences in proof: 31
% 7.87/3.17  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2816 ms resp. 2171 ms w/o parsing
% 7.04/3.23  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.04/3.23  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------