↑ Up

Lash---1.13.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Lash---1.13
% Problem  : SYO364^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  9 03:23:18 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 25.61s 25.68s
% Output   : Proof 25.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   32
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  12 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  185 (  26   ~;  13   |;   0   &; 110   @)
%                                         (  13 <=>;  23  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   25 (  25   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   22 (  20 usr;  16 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   1   ^;  36   !;   0   ?;  37   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_a,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(ty_j,type,
    j: a > a ).

thf(ty_f,type,
    f: ( a > a ) > a > a ).

thf(ty_eigen__0,type,
    eigen__0: ( a > a ) > $o ).

thf(ty_g,type,
    g: ( a > a ) > a > a ).

thf(ty_eigen__2,type,
    eigen__2: a ).

thf(ty_h,type,
    h: a > a ).

thf(h0,assumption,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a] :
      ( ( X1 @ X2 )
     => ( X1 @ ( eps__0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(eigendef_eigen__2,definition,
    ( eigen__2
    = ( eps__0
      @ ^ [X1: a] :
          ( ( f @ h @ X1 )
         != ( g @ j @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[eigen__2])]) ).

thf(sP1,plain,
    ( sP1
  <=> ( eigen__0 @ ( f @ h ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).

thf(sP2,plain,
    ( sP2
  <=> ( h = j ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).

thf(sP3,plain,
    ( sP3
  <=> ( ( g @ h @ eigen__2 )
      = ( g @ j @ eigen__2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).

thf(sP4,plain,
    ( sP4
  <=> $false ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).

thf(sP5,plain,
    ( sP5
  <=> ( ( g @ h @ eigen__2 )
      = ( f @ h @ eigen__2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).

thf(sP6,plain,
    ( sP6
  <=> ( ( f @ h @ eigen__2 )
      = ( g @ j @ eigen__2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).

thf(sP7,plain,
    ( sP7
  <=> ( ( f @ h )
      = ( g @ j ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).

thf(sP8,plain,
    ( sP8
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( f @ h @ X1 )
        = ( g @ j @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).

thf(sP9,plain,
    ( sP9
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( h @ X1 )
        = ( j @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])]) ).

thf(sP10,plain,
    ( sP10
  <=> ( eigen__0 @ ( g @ j ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])]) ).

thf(sP11,plain,
    ( sP11
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( f @ h @ X1 )
        = ( g @ h @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])]) ).

thf(sP12,plain,
    ( sP12
  <=> ( ( f @ h @ eigen__2 )
      = ( g @ h @ eigen__2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])]) ).

thf(sP13,plain,
    ( sP13
  <=> ! [X1: a > a,X2: a] :
        ( ( f @ X1 @ X2 )
        = ( g @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])]) ).

thf(cEDEC_pme,conjecture,
    ( ~ ( ! [X1: a > a,X2: a,X3: a > $o] :
            ( ( X3 @ ( f @ X1 @ X2 ) )
           => ( X3 @ ( g @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
       => ~ ! [X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
              ( ( X2 @ ( h @ X1 ) )
             => ( X2 @ ( j @ X1 ) ) ) )
   => ! [X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
        ( ( X1 @ ( f @ h ) )
       => ( X1 @ ( g @ j ) ) ) ) ).

thf(h1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( ! [X1: a > a,X2: a,X3: a > $o] :
              ( ( X3 @ ( f @ X1 @ X2 ) )
             => ( X3 @ ( g @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
         => ~ ! [X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
                ( ( X2 @ ( h @ X1 ) )
               => ( X2 @ ( j @ X1 ) ) ) )
     => ! [X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
          ( ( X1 @ ( f @ h ) )
         => ( X1 @ ( g @ j ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cEDEC_pme]) ).

thf(h2,assumption,
    ~ ( ! [X1: a > a,X2: a,X3: a > $o] :
          ( ( X3 @ ( f @ X1 @ X2 ) )
         => ( X3 @ ( g @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
     => ~ ! [X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
            ( ( X2 @ ( h @ X1 ) )
           => ( X2 @ ( j @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h3,assumption,
    ~ ! [X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
        ( ( X1 @ ( f @ h ) )
       => ( X1 @ ( g @ j ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h4,assumption,
    ! [X1: a > a,X2: a,X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( X3 @ ( f @ X1 @ X2 ) )
     => ( X3 @ ( g @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h5,assumption,
    ! [X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( X2 @ ( h @ X1 ) )
     => ( X2 @ ( j @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h6,assumption,
    ~ ( sP1
     => sP10 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h7,assumption,
    sP1,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h8,assumption,
    ~ sP10,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(1,plain,
    ( sP3
    | sP4
    | ~ sP2 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(2,plain,
    ( ~ sP12
    | sP6
    | ~ sP5
    | ~ sP3 ),
    inference(confrontation_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ~ sP12
    | sP5 ),
    inference(symeq,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ~ sP11
    | sP12 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( sP2
    | ~ sP9 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ~ sP4,
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( sP8
    | ~ sP6 ),
    inference(eigen_choice_rule,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[h0,eigendef_eigen__2]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( sP7
    | ~ sP8 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ~ sP1
    | sP10
    | ~ sP7 ),
    inference(mating_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ~ sP13
    | sP11 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h8,h6,h4,h4,h5,h5,h2,h3,h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,h4,h5,h7,h8]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h6,h4,h4,h5,h5,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h7,h8])],[h6,11,h7,h8]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h4,h5,h5,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h6]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h3,12,h6]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h4,h5])],[h2,13,h4,h5]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h2,h3])],[h1,14,h2,h3]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(eigenvar_choice,[status(thm),assumptions([h1]),eigenvar_choice(discharge,[h0])],[15,h0]) ).

thf(0,theorem,
    ( ~ ( ! [X1: a > a,X2: a,X3: a > $o] :
            ( ( X3 @ ( f @ X1 @ X2 ) )
           => ( X3 @ ( g @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
       => ~ ! [X1: a,X2: a > $o] :
              ( ( X2 @ ( h @ X1 ) )
             => ( X2 @ ( j @ X1 ) ) ) )
   => ! [X1: ( a > a ) > $o] :
        ( ( X1 @ ( f @ h ) )
       => ( X1 @ ( g @ j ) ) ) ),
    inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h1])],[15,h1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYO364^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Oct  9 01:08:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 25.61/25.68  % SZS status Theorem
% 25.61/25.68  % Mode: cade22grackle2x798d
% 25.61/25.68  % Steps: 134103
% 25.61/25.68  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------