%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO365^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:44:16 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 0.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 6 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 2 @)
% ( 4 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 4 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 ^; 2 !; 0 ?; 2 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
cA: $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
cC: $o > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
cEXT2: $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
cEXT_eq_0: $o ).
thf(cEXT2A,conjecture,
( cEXT_eq_0
=> cEXT2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tvJuLsRVWX/E---3.1_1544801.p',cEXT2A) ).
thf(cEXT_eq_0_def,axiom,
( cEXT_eq_0
<=> ! [X1: $o,X2: $o] :
( ( X1
<=> X2 )
=> ( X1
<=> X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tvJuLsRVWX/E---3.1_1544801.p',cEXT_eq_0_def) ).
thf(cEXT2_def,axiom,
( cEXT2
<=> ( ( cC @ cA )
=> ( cC
@ ~ ~ cA ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tvJuLsRVWX/E---3.1_1544801.p',cEXT2_def) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( cEXT_eq_0
=> cEXT2 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cEXT2A]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,cEXT_eq_0_def]),cEXT2_def])])]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO365^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.19 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.06/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:51:52 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.06/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.24 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.06/0.25 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tvJuLsRVWX/E---3.1_1544801.p
% 0.25/0.26 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.25/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % post_as_ho8 with pid 1544815 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Result found by post_as_ho8
% 0.25/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.25/0.26 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.25/0.26 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFMFNN
% 0.25/0.26 % partial match(1): HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1544820 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting post_as_ho8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.25/0.26 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.25/0.26 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFMFNN
% 0.25/0.26 % partial match(1): HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.26 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.25/0.26
% 0.25/0.26 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.26 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/0.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.26 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.25/0.26 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.25/0.26 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.26 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.25/0.26 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.26 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.26 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.26 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.26 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.26 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.26 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.26 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.26 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.26 % Termbank termtop insertions : 181
% 0.25/0.26 % Search garbage collected termcells : 45
% 0.25/0.26
% 0.25/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.26 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.26 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.26 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 3884 pages
% 0.25/0.26
% 0.25/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.26 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.26 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.26 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.25/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.25/0.26 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------