↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYO369_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:26:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.86s 1.17s
% Output   : Refutation 2.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  160 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (  40   ~;  33   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   74 (  72 fml;   2 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   5 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    1 (   1   !;   0   ?;   1   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    bG0: $o ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    bG1: $o ).

tff(pred_def_3,type,
    cP: $o > $o ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( cP(( cA
       => cB ))
   => cP(( ~ cA
        | cB )) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTRIVEXT5) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( cP(( cA
         => cB ))
     => cP(( ~ cA
          | cB )) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f3,definition,
    ( ( ~ cA
      | cB )
  <=> ( bG0 = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG0])],[fool_formula_definition]) ).

tff(f4,definition,
    ( ( cA
     => cB )
  <=> ( $true = bG1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[bG1])],[fool_formula_definition]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ~ ( cP(bG1)
     => cP(bG0) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f2,f4,f3]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ( ~ cP(bG0)
    & cP(bG1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ( ( cB
      | ~ cA )
  <=> ( $true = bG1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ( ( ~ cA
      | cB
      | ( bG0 != $true ) )
    & ( ( bG0 = $true )
      | ( cA
        & ~ cB ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ( ( ~ cA
      | cB
      | ( bG0 != $true ) )
    & ( ( bG0 = $true )
      | ( cA
        & ~ cB ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ( ( cB
      | ~ cA
      | ( $true != bG1 ) )
    & ( ( $true = bG1 )
      | ( ~ cB
        & cA ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ( ( cB
      | ~ cA
      | ( $true != bG1 ) )
    & ( ( $true = bG1 )
      | ( ~ cB
        & cA ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    cP(bG1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ~ cP(bG0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ( ( bG0 = $true )
    | ~ cB ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ( ( bG0 = $true )
    | cA ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ( ~ cA
    | cB
    | ( bG0 != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( ( $true = bG1 )
    | cA ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( ( $true = bG1 )
    | ~ cB ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ( cB
    | ~ cA
    | ( $true != bG1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: $o] :
      ( ( $true = (X0) )
      | ( $false = (X0) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[fool_exhaustiveness_axiom]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ( ~ cP($true)
    | ~ cB ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f13,f14]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ( ~ cP($true)
    | cA ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f13,f15]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ( cP($true)
    | cA ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f12,f17]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ( cP($true)
    | ~ cB ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f12,f18]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    ~ cB,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f25,f22]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    cA,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f24,f23]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ( ~ cA
    | ( bG0 != $true ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f26]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    bG0 != $true,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f28,f27]) ).

tff(f34,plain,
    ( ~ cA
    | ( $true != bG1 ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f26]) ).

tff(f35,plain,
    $true != bG1,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f34,f27]) ).

tff(f44,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( bG1 = $false ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f35,f21]) ).

tff(f46,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( bG0 = $false ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f29,f21]) ).

tff(f49,plain,
    bG0 = $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f46]) ).

tff(f50,plain,
    bG1 = $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f44]) ).

tff(f57,plain,
    ~ cP($false),
    inference(superposition,[],[f13,f49]) ).

tff(f69,plain,
    cP($false),
    inference(superposition,[],[f12,f50]) ).

tff(f75,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f69,f57]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO369_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.18  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 17:42:33 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.21  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.86/1.17  % (542582)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=3420727110:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)First to succeed.
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-542582"
% 2.86/1.17  % (542708)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=3275200932:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542712)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=2108338232:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542707)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=2615089359:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542711)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=2791005070:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=2624746108:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542706)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=2887751380:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542712)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.86/1.17  % (542712)------------------------------
% 2.86/1.17  % (542712)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542712)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.86/1.17  % (542712)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.86/1.17  % (542712)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.86/1.17  % (542712)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 2.86/1.17  % (542712)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)------------------------------
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.86/1.17  % (542709)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542711)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.86/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.86/1.17  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)------------------------------
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)------------------------------
% 2.86/1.17  % (542710)------------------------------
% 2.86/1.17  % (542582)Success in time 0.316 s
% 2.86/1.17  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------