↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYO371^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:08:57 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.76s 3.99s
% Output   : Proof 3.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SYO371^5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 13:27:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.76/3.99  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.76/3.99  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not ((∀ (R : Prop → Prop), R cP → R cQ) → Iff cP cQ)) True
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq ((∀ (R : Prop → Prop), R cP → R cQ) → Iff cP cQ) False
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (R : Prop → Prop), R cP → R cQ) True
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Iff cP cQ) False
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop), Eq (a cP → a cQ) True
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop), Or (Eq (a cP) False) (Eq (a cQ) True)
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #6 (by identity loobHoist #[5]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop), Or (Eq (a cQ) True) (Or (Eq (a True) False) (Eq cP False))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #7 (by identity boolHoist #[5]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop), Or (Eq (a cQ) True) (Or (Eq (a False) False) (Eq cP True))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #9 (by identity boolHoist #[6]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop), Or (Eq (a True) False) (Or (Eq cP False) (Or (Eq (a False) True) (Eq cQ True)))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #10 (by clausification #[3]): Or (Eq cP False) (Eq cQ False)
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #11 (by clausification #[3]): Or (Eq cP True) (Eq cQ True)
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #12 (by identity loobHoist #[7]): ∀ (a : Prop → Prop), Or (Eq (a False) False) (Or (Eq cP True) (Or (Eq (a True) True) (Eq cQ False)))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #16 (by neHoist #[12]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP True)
% 3.76/3.99      (Or (Eq ((fun x => Ne (a_1 x) (a_2 x)) True) True)
% 3.76/3.99        (Or (Eq cQ False) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_1 False) (a_2 False)))))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #22 (by neHoist #[9]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP False)
% 3.76/3.99      (Or (Eq ((fun x => Ne (a_1 x) (a_2 x)) False) True)
% 3.76/3.99        (Or (Eq cQ True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_1 True) (a_2 True)))))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #52 (by betaEtaReduce #[16]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP True)
% 3.76/3.99      (Or (Eq (Ne (a_1 True) (a_2 True)) True) (Or (Eq cQ False) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_1 False) (a_2 False)))))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #53 (by clausification #[52]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP True) (Or (Eq cQ False) (Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (a_1 False) (a_2 False)) (Ne (a_1 True) (a_2 True)))))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #54 (by clausification #[53]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP True) (Or (Eq cQ False) (Or (Eq (a_1 False) (a_2 False)) (Ne (a_1 True) (a_2 True))))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #55 (by superposition #[54, 11]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP True) (Or (Eq (a_1 False) (a_2 False)) (Or (Ne (a_1 True) (a_2 True)) (Or (Eq cP True) (Eq False True))))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #60 (by clausification #[55]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP True) (Or (Eq (a_1 False) (a_2 False)) (Or (Ne (a_1 True) (a_2 True)) (Eq cP True)))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #61 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[60]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP True) (Or (Eq (a_1 False) (a_2 False)) (Ne (a_1 True) (a_2 True)))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #62 (by equality resolution #[61]): Or (Eq cP True) (Eq ((fun x => x) False) ((fun x => True) False))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #69 (by betaEtaReduce #[62]): Or (Eq cP True) (Eq False True)
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #70 (by clausification #[69]): Eq cP True
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #71 (by backward demodulation #[70, 10]): Or (Eq True False) (Eq cQ False)
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #85 (by clausification #[71]): Eq cQ False
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #112 (by betaEtaReduce #[22]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP False)
% 3.76/3.99      (Or (Eq (Ne (a_1 False) (a_2 False)) True) (Or (Eq cQ True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a_1 True) (a_2 True)))))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #113 (by clausification #[112]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP False) (Or (Eq cQ True) (Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (a_1 True) (a_2 True)) (Ne (a_1 False) (a_2 False)))))
% 3.76/3.99  Clause #114 (by clausification #[113]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/3.99    Or (Eq cP False) (Or (Eq cQ True) (Or (Eq (a_1 True) (a_2 True)) (Ne (a_1 False) (a_2 False))))
% 3.76/4.00  Clause #115 (by forward demodulation #[114, 70]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/4.00    Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq cQ True) (Or (Eq (a_1 True) (a_2 True)) (Ne (a_1 False) (a_2 False))))
% 3.76/4.00  Clause #116 (by clausification #[115]): ∀ (a : Prop → Sort _abstMVar.0) (a_1 a_2 : (x : Prop) → a x),
% 3.76/4.00    Or (Eq cQ True) (Or (Eq (a_1 True) (a_2 True)) (Ne (a_1 False) (a_2 False)))
% 3.76/4.00  Clause #117 (by equality resolution #[116]): Or (Eq cQ True) (Eq ((fun x => x) True) ((fun x => False) True))
% 3.76/4.00  Clause #124 (by betaEtaReduce #[117]): Or (Eq cQ True) (Eq True False)
% 3.76/4.00  Clause #125 (by clausification #[124]): Eq cQ True
% 3.76/4.00  Clause #126 (by superposition #[125, 85]): Eq True False
% 3.76/4.00  Clause #129 (by clausification #[126]): False
% 3.76/4.00  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------