%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO384^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:44:18 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 7 avg)
% Number of connectives : 138 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 12 &; 96 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 26 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 0 ^; 44 !; 24 ?; 68 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
cD: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
cF: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
cS: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(cTHM408,conjecture,
( ( ( ! [X1: $i] :
? [X2: $i] : ( cF @ X1 @ X2 )
& ? [X1: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X4: $i] :
! [X5: $i] :
( ( cS @ X4 @ X5 )
=> ( cD @ X5 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X3: $i] :
? [X6: $i] :
! [X7: $i,X8: $i] :
( ( cD @ X7 @ X8 @ X6 )
=> ! [X2: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( ( cF @ X7 @ X2 )
& ( cF @ X8 @ X9 ) )
=> ( cD @ X2 @ X9 @ X3 ) ) ) )
=> ? [X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X10: $i] :
! [X5: $i] :
( ( cS @ X10 @ X5 )
=> ! [X9: $i] :
( ( cF @ X5 @ X9 )
=> ( cD @ X9 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
=> ( ( ! [X1: $i] :
? [X2: $i] : ( cF @ X1 @ X2 )
& ? [X1: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X4: $i] :
! [X5: $i] :
( ( cS @ X4 @ X5 )
=> ( cD @ X5 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X3: $i] :
? [X6: $i] :
! [X7: $i,X8: $i] :
( ( cD @ X7 @ X8 @ X6 )
=> ! [X2: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( ( cF @ X7 @ X2 )
& ( cF @ X8 @ X9 ) )
=> ( cD @ X2 @ X9 @ X3 ) ) ) )
=> ? [X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X10: $i] :
! [X5: $i] :
( ( cS @ X10 @ X5 )
=> ! [X9: $i] :
( ( cF @ X5 @ X9 )
=> ( cD @ X9 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PZ3lKzSj1J/E---3.1_1050966.p',cTHM408) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ( ! [X1: $i] :
? [X2: $i] : ( cF @ X1 @ X2 )
& ? [X1: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X4: $i] :
! [X5: $i] :
( ( cS @ X4 @ X5 )
=> ( cD @ X5 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X3: $i] :
? [X6: $i] :
! [X7: $i,X8: $i] :
( ( cD @ X7 @ X8 @ X6 )
=> ! [X2: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( ( cF @ X7 @ X2 )
& ( cF @ X8 @ X9 ) )
=> ( cD @ X2 @ X9 @ X3 ) ) ) )
=> ? [X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X10: $i] :
! [X5: $i] :
( ( cS @ X10 @ X5 )
=> ! [X9: $i] :
( ( cF @ X5 @ X9 )
=> ( cD @ X9 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
=> ( ( ! [X1: $i] :
? [X2: $i] : ( cF @ X1 @ X2 )
& ? [X1: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X4: $i] :
! [X5: $i] :
( ( cS @ X4 @ X5 )
=> ( cD @ X5 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X3: $i] :
? [X6: $i] :
! [X7: $i,X8: $i] :
( ( cD @ X7 @ X8 @ X6 )
=> ! [X2: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( ( cF @ X7 @ X2 )
& ( cF @ X8 @ X9 ) )
=> ( cD @ X2 @ X9 @ X3 ) ) ) )
=> ? [X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
? [X10: $i] :
! [X5: $i] :
( ( cS @ X10 @ X5 )
=> ! [X9: $i] :
( ( cF @ X5 @ X9 )
=> ( cD @ X9 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM408]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYO384^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.26 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.26 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.26 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.26 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:50:02 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.27 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.33 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.34 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PZ3lKzSj1J/E---3.1_1050966.p
% 0.26/0.37 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.26/0.37 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % new_bool_1 with pid 1050980 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.26/0.37 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.37 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.37 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1050984 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.37 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.37 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.37 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.37 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.37 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/0.37
% 0.26/0.37 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.37 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.37 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.37 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.26/0.37 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.26/0.37 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.37 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.26/0.37 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.37 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.37 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.37 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.37 % Termbank termtop insertions : 321
% 0.26/0.37 % Search garbage collected termcells : 99
% 0.26/0.37
% 0.26/0.37 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.37 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.37 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.37 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.26/0.37 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.26/0.37
% 0.26/0.37 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.37 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.37 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.26/0.37 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.26/0.37 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.37 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------