%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem : SYO397^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:47:36 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.27s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 19
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 47 ( 41 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 243 ( 46 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 310 ( 46 ~; 39 |; 0 &; 208 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 44 ( 44 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 56 ( 52 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% ( 17 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 92 ( 84 ^; 8 !; 0 ?; 92 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
mu: $tType ).
thf(type_def_6,type,
sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
meq_ind: mu > mu > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
meq_prop: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_7,type,
mimplied: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_8,type,
mequiv: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
mxor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_10,type,
mforall_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_11,type,
mforall_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_12,type,
mexists_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_13,type,
mexists_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_14,type,
mtrue: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_15,type,
mfalse: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_16,type,
mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_17,type,
mdia: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_18,type,
mreflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_19,type,
msymmetric: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_20,type,
mserial: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_21,type,
mtransitive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_22,type,
meuclidean: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_23,type,
mpartially_functional: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_24,type,
mfunctional: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_25,type,
mweakly_dense: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_26,type,
mweakly_connected: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_27,type,
mweakly_directed: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_28,type,
mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_29,type,
minvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_30,type,
msatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_31,type,
mcountersatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_32,type,
rel_k: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_33,type,
mbox_k: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_34,type,
mdia_k: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_35,type,
p: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_36,type,
q: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_37,type,
vPI:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_38,type,
vOR: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_39,type,
vNOT: $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_40,type,
db1:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_41,type,
db0:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_42,type,
db2:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_43,type,
vLAM:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).
thf(func_def_44,type,
vSIGMA:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_45,type,
vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_46,type,
vAND: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_47,type,
db3:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_48,type,
vEQ:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_51,type,
db4:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f3,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
~ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
= mnot ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mnot) ).
thf(f4,axiom,
( mor
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
( ( X0 @ X2 )
| ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mor) ).
thf(f6,axiom,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mimplies) ).
thf(f28,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
= mvalid ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mvalid) ).
thf(f32,axiom,
( mbox_k
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
! [X2: $i] :
( ( X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^1.ax',mbox_k) ).
thf(f34,conjecture,
mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_k @ p ) @ ( mbox_k @ ( mimplies @ q @ p ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove) ).
thf(f35,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_k @ p ) @ ( mbox_k @ ( mimplies @ q @ p ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f34]) ).
thf(f36,plain,
( mbox_k
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
! [X2: $i] :
( ( X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f32]) ).
thf(f37,plain,
( mbox_k
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Y1 @ Y2 )
| ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f36]) ).
thf(f40,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
~ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
= mnot ),
inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).
thf(f41,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f40]) ).
thf(f45,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f60,plain,
~ ( mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_k @ p ) @ ( mbox_k @ ( mimplies @ q @ p ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f35]) ).
thf(f61,plain,
( ( mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_k @ p ) @ ( mbox_k @ ( mimplies @ q @ p ) ) ) )
!= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f60]) ).
thf(f70,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
( ( X0 @ X2 )
| ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f71,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
| ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f70]) ).
thf(f72,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
= mvalid ),
inference(rectify,[],[f28]) ).
thf(f73,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f72]) ).
thf(f92,plain,
( ( mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_k @ p ) @ ( mbox_k @ ( mimplies @ q @ p ) ) ) )
!= $true ),
inference(flattening,[],[f61]) ).
thf(f94,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f73]) ).
thf(f108,plain,
( mbox_k
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Y1 @ Y2 )
| ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).
thf(f122,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).
thf(f123,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
| ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).
thf(f124,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).
thf(f126,plain,
( ( mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_k @ p ) @ ( mbox_k @ ( mimplies @ q @ p ) ) ) )
!= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).
thf(f130,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
( ( Y3 @ Y4 )
| ( Y2 @ Y4 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
@ Y0 )
@ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f122,f123,f124]) ).
thf(f139,plain,
( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
( ( Y3 @ Y4 )
| ( Y2 @ Y4 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
@ Y0 )
@ Y1 )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Y1 @ Y2 )
| ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) )
@ p )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y2: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Y1 @ Y2 )
| ( Y0 @ Y2 ) ) )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
( ( Y3 @ Y4 )
| ( Y2 @ Y4 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
@ Y0 )
@ Y1 )
@ q
@ p ) ) ) )
!= $true ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f126,f94,f130,f108,f108,f130]) ).
thf(f140,plain,
( ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Y0 @ Y1 )
| ( p @ Y1 )
| ~ ( q @ Y1 ) ) )
| ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Y0 @ Y1 )
| ( p @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
!= $true ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f139]) ).
thf(f141,plain,
( $false
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Y0 @ Y1 )
| ( p @ Y1 )
| ~ ( q @ Y1 ) ) )
| ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Y0 @ Y1 )
| ( p @ Y1 ) ) ) )
@ sK0 ) ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f140]) ).
thf(f142,plain,
( $false
= ( ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( p @ Y0 )
| ~ ( q @ Y0 ) ) )
| ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( p @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f141]) ).
thf(f143,plain,
( $false
= ( ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( p @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f142]) ).
thf(f144,plain,
( $false
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( p @ Y0 )
| ~ ( q @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f142]) ).
thf(f145,plain,
( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( p @ Y0 )
| ~ ( q @ Y0 ) )
@ sK1 )
= $false ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f144]) ).
thf(f146,plain,
( $false
= ( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ sK1 )
| ( p @ sK1 )
| ~ ( q @ sK1 ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f145]) ).
thf(f147,plain,
( $false
= ( ( p @ sK1 )
| ~ ( q @ sK1 ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f146]) ).
thf(f148,plain,
( $false
= ( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ sK1 ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f146]) ).
thf(f149,plain,
( ( rel_k @ sK0 @ sK1 )
= $true ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f148]) ).
thf(f151,plain,
( $false
= ( p @ sK1 ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f147]) ).
thf(f153,plain,
( ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f143]) ).
thf(f154,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ Y0 )
| ( p @ Y0 ) )
@ X1 )
= $true ),
inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f153]) ).
thf(f155,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ X1 )
| ( p @ X1 ) )
= $true ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f154]) ).
thf(f156,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( ( p @ X1 )
= $true )
| ( ( ~ ( rel_k @ sK0 @ X1 ) )
= $true ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f155]) ).
thf(f157,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( rel_k @ sK0 @ X1 ) )
| ( ( p @ X1 )
= $true ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f156]) ).
thf(f158,plain,
( ( $false = $true )
| ( ( p @ sK1 )
= $true ) ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f149,f157]) ).
thf(f160,plain,
( ( p @ sK1 )
= $true ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f158]) ).
thf(f162,plain,
$false = $true,
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f160,f151]) ).
thf(f163,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f162]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO397^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.17 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.17 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.17 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.17 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.17 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.17 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:53:08 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.18 Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.20 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.22 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549082)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3935595480:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1549082-1549087"...
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)...printing done.
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.27 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.27 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549087)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 0.18/0.27 % (1549082)Success in time 0.039 s
% 0.18/0.27 % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------