%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO409^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:42:55 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 18
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 51 ( 23 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 260 ( 20 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 90 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 620 ( 117 ~; 146 |; 23 &; 334 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 31 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 31 ( 31 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 17 ( 15 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 72 ( 45 ^; 27 !; 0 ?; 72 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_25,type,
mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_27,type,
mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_28,type,
mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_30,type,
mequiv: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_50,type,
mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_54,type,
rel_k: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_55,type,
mbox_k: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_56,type,
mdia_k: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_57,type,
p: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_58,type,
q: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_59,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_60,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_61,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(decl_62,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
thf(mand,axiom,
( mand
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ ( mnot @ X7 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p',mand) ).
thf(mnot,axiom,
( mnot
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
~ ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p',mnot) ).
thf(mor,axiom,
( mor
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X6 @ X3 )
| ( X7 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p',mor) ).
thf(mimplies,axiom,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ X7 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p',mimplies) ).
thf(mequiv,axiom,
( mequiv
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mand @ ( mimplies @ X6 @ X7 ) @ ( mimplies @ X7 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p',mequiv) ).
thf(mdia_k,axiom,
( mdia_k
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mbox_k @ ( mnot @ X6 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p',mdia_k) ).
thf(mbox_k,axiom,
( mbox_k
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
! [X14: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X3 @ X14 )
| ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p',mbox_k) ).
thf(prove,conjecture,
mvalid @ ( mequiv @ ( mdia_k @ ( mor @ p @ q ) ) @ ( mor @ ( mdia_k @ p ) @ ( mdia_k @ q ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p',prove) ).
thf(mvalid,axiom,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p',mvalid) ).
thf(c_0_9,plain,
( mand
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mand]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( mequiv
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) )
| ~ ( ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 )
| ( Z0 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mequiv]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
( mand
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
( mdia_k
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ! [X21: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Z1 @ X21 )
| ~ ( Z0 @ X21 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mdia_k]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
( mbox_k
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
! [X14: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Z1 @ X14 )
| ( Z0 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox_k]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mvalid @ ( mequiv @ ( mdia_k @ ( mor @ p @ q ) ) @ ( mor @ ( mdia_k @ p ) @ ( mdia_k @ q ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
( mequiv
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) )
| ~ ( ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 )
| ( Z0 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).
thf(c_0_21,plain,
( mdia_k
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ! [X21: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ Z1 @ X21 )
| ~ ( Z0 @ X21 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]),c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X25: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( ~ ~ ! [X22: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X22 )
| ~ ( ( p @ X22 )
| ( q @ X22 ) ) )
| ~ ! [X23: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X23 )
| ~ ( p @ X23 ) )
| ~ ! [X24: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X24 )
| ~ ( q @ X24 ) ) )
| ~ ( ~ ( ~ ! [X23: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X23 )
| ~ ( p @ X23 ) )
| ~ ! [X24: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X24 )
| ~ ( q @ X24 ) ) )
| ~ ! [X22: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ X25 @ X22 )
| ~ ( ( p @ X22 )
| ( q @ X22 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_11]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
! [X28: $i,X29: $i,X32: $i] :
( ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( p @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( q @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( p @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( q @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ~ ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ~ ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ~ ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ~ ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ~ ( p @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ~ ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ~ ( q @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X28 )
| ~ ( p @ X28 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ~ ( p @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) )
& ( ~ ( q @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X32 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X29 )
| ~ ( q @ X29 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( q @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( q @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ~ ( q @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X14 )
| ~ ( q @ X14 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).
thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_30]) ).
thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( q @ X3 ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]) ).
thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( p @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]) ).
thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
( ( q @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
| ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
| ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).
thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ( q @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_42]),c_0_43]),c_0_44]) ).
thf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( p @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( q @ X3 ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_45]),c_0_38])]) ).
thf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ~ ( p @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X14 )
| ~ ( p @ X14 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
p @ esk2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_45]),c_0_38])]) ).
thf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_k @ esk1_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( p @ X3 ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_38])]) ).
thf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_48]),c_0_38])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO409^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.16 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.16 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.16 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.16 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.16 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.16 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:53:42 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.16 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.16 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.20 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.21 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8xSWRuGNV0/E---3.1_855995.p
% 0.09/0.23 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.09/0.23 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting almost_fo_3_lam with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 856009 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.09/0.23 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.23 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.23 % Search class: HGHNF-FFMM00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % SubtermCWHack with pid 856012 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.23 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.23 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.23 % Search class: HGHNF-FFMM00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.23
% 0.09/0.23 % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.23 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.23 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.23 % Parsed axioms : 71
% 0.09/0.23 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Initial clauses : 61
% 0.09/0.23 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 37
% 0.09/0.23 % Initial clauses in saturation : 24
% 0.09/0.23 % Processed clauses : 48
% 0.09/0.23 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % ...subsumed : 9
% 0.09/0.23 % ...remaining for further processing : 39
% 0.09/0.23 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Backward-subsumed : 24
% 0.09/0.23 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.09/0.23 % Generated clauses : 80
% 0.09/0.23 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 66
% 0.09/0.23 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 0.09/0.23 % Paramodulations : 80
% 0.09/0.23 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Total rewrite steps : 36
% 0.09/0.23 % ...of those cached : 34
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.09/0.23 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.09/0.23 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.09/0.23 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 39
% 0.09/0.23 % ...number of literals in the above : 168
% 0.09/0.23 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Current number of archived clauses : 33
% 0.09/0.23 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 63
% 0.09/0.23 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 0.09/0.23 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 40
% 0.09/0.23 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.09/0.23 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.09/0.23 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.09/0.23 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4514
% 0.09/0.23 % Search garbage collected termcells : 621
% 0.09/0.23
% 0.09/0.23 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.23 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.23 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.09/0.23 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.09/0.23 % Maximum resident set size: 3696 pages
% 0.09/0.23
% 0.09/0.23 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.23 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.09/0.23 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.09/0.23 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.09/0.23 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.23 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------