%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SYO419^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:45 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.67s 2.23s
% Output : Refutation 3.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO419^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.22 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.22 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.22 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.22 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.22 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.22 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.22 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.22 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:46:37 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.22 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.22 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.87/0.79 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.50/1.06 % [INFO] Parsing done (268ms).
% 1.50/1.08 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.10/1.47 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.10/1.48 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.49/1.66 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.49/1.69 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.49/1.70 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 2.67/1.70 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.67/1.70 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.67/2.22 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.67/2.23 % Time passed: 1865ms (effective reasoning time: 1142ms)
% 3.67/2.23 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.67/2.23 % Axioms used in derivation (1): a1
% 3.67/2.23 % No. of inferences in proof: 11
% 3.67/2.23 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1865 ms resp. 1142 ms w/o parsing
% 3.67/2.29 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mu_type, type, mu: $tType).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mand_decl, type, mand: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mserial_decl, type, mserial: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(rel_d_decl, type, rel_d: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mbox_d_decl, type, mbox_d: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(p_decl, type, p: ($i > $o)).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(sk1_decl, type, sk1: $i).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(sk2_decl, type, sk2: ($i > $i)).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mand_def, definition, mand = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mor @ (mnot @ A) @ (mnot @ B)))) ).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mserial_def, definition, mserial = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i]: ? [C:$i]: (A @ B @ C)) ).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(mbox_d_def, definition, mbox_d = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_d @ B @ C) | (A @ C))) ).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(sk1_def, definition, sk1 = (@+ [A:$i]: ~ (? [B:$i]: (rel_d @ A @ B))) ).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(sk2_def, definition, sk2 = (^ [A:$i]: (@+ [B:$i]: (rel_d @ A @ B))) ).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(3,axiom,((mserial @ rel_d)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1)).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(7,plain,((! [A:$i]: ? [B:$i]: (rel_d @ A @ B))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(8,plain,(! [A:$i] : ((rel_d @ A @ (sk2 @ A)))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7])).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(1,conjecture,((mvalid @ (mnot @ (mbox_d @ (mand @ p @ (mnot @ p)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove)).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (mvalid @ (mnot @ (mbox_d @ (mand @ p @ (mnot @ p))))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(4,plain,((~ (! [A:$i]: ~ (! [B:$i]: ~ (rel_d @ A @ B))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(5,plain,((~ (~ (~ (! [A:$i]: ? [B:$i]: (rel_d @ A @ B)))))),inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(6,plain,(! [A:$i] : ((~ (rel_d @ sk1 @ A)))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[5])).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(9,plain,(! [B:$i,A:$i] : (~ (($true)) | ((rel_d @ A @ (sk2 @ A)) != (rel_d @ sk1 @ B)))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[8,6])).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(10,plain,(! [B:$i,A:$i] : (((rel_d @ A @ (sk2 @ A)) != (rel_d @ sk1 @ B)))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9])).
% 3.67/2.29 thf(11,plain,(($false)),inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[10:[bind(A, $thf(sk1)),bind(B, $thf(sk2 @ sk1))]])).
% 3.67/2.29 % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.67/2.29 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------