%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Satallax---3.5 % Problem : SYO428^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Oct 9 03:25:34 PM UTC 2025 % Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s % Output : Proof 0.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYO428^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Oct 9 01:19:08 EDT 2025 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.38 % SZS status Theorem % 0.13/0.38 % Mode: mode213 % 0.13/0.38 % Inferences: 18 % 0.13/0.38 % SZS output start Proof % 0.13/0.38 thf(ty_p, type, p : ($i>$o)). % 0.13/0.38 thf(ty_rel_m, type, rel_m : ($i>$i>$o)). % 0.13/0.38 thf(ty_q, type, q : ($i>$o)). % 0.13/0.38 thf(ty_eigen__1, type, eigen__1 : $i). % 0.13/0.38 thf(ty_eigen__0, type, eigen__0 : $i). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP1,plain,sP1 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel_m @ eigen__0) @ X1) => (p @ X1))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP2,plain,sP2 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel_m @ eigen__1) @ X1) => (q @ X1))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP3,plain,sP3 <=> ((rel_m @ eigen__1) @ eigen__1),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP4,plain,sP4 <=> (![X1:$i]:((rel_m @ X1) @ X1)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP5,plain,sP5 <=> (((rel_m @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1) => (p @ eigen__1)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP6,plain,sP6 <=> (((rel_m @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1) => (~((q @ eigen__1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP7,plain,sP7 <=> (sP3 => (q @ eigen__1)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP8,plain,sP8 <=> (p @ eigen__1),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP9,plain,sP9 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel_m @ eigen__0) @ X1) => (~((q @ X1))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP10,plain,sP10 <=> (q @ eigen__1),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(sP11,plain,sP11 <=> ((rel_m @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_meq_ind,definition,(meq_ind = (^[X1:mu]:(^[X2:mu]:(^[X3:$i]:(X1 = X2)))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_meq_prop,definition,(meq_prop = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:((X1 @ X3) = (X2 @ X3))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mnot,definition,(mnot = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mor,definition,(mor = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:((~((X1 @ X3))) => (X2 @ X3))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mand,definition,(mand = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(mnot @ ((mor @ (mnot @ X1)) @ (mnot @ X2))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mimplies,definition,(mimplies = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X1))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mimplied,definition,(mimplied = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mor @ (mnot @ X2)) @ X1))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mequiv,definition,(mequiv = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mand @ ((mimplies @ X1) @ X2)) @ ((mimplies @ X2) @ X1)))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mxor,definition,(mxor = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(mnot @ ((mequiv @ X1) @ X2)))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mforall_ind,definition,(mforall_ind = (^[X1:mu>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(![X3:mu]:((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mforall_prop,definition,(mforall_prop = (^[X1:($i>$o)>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(![X3:$i>$o]:((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mexists_ind,definition,(mexists_ind = (^[X1:mu>$i>$o]:(mnot @ (mforall_ind @ (^[X2:mu]:(mnot @ (X1 @ X2)))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mexists_prop,definition,(mexists_prop = (^[X1:($i>$o)>$i>$o]:(mnot @ (mforall_prop @ (^[X2:$i>$o]:(mnot @ (X1 @ X2)))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mtrue,definition,(mtrue = (^[X1:$i]:(~($false))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mfalse,definition,(mfalse = (mnot @ mtrue))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mbox,definition,(mbox = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X4) => (X2 @ X4)))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mdia,definition,(mdia = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(mnot @ ((mbox @ X1) @ (mnot @ X2))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mreflexive,definition,(mreflexive = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2) @ X2))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_msymmetric,definition,(msymmetric = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => ((X1 @ X3) @ X2))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mserial,definition,(mserial = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(~((![X3:$i]:(~(((X1 @ X2) @ X3)))))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mtransitive,definition,(mtransitive = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X3) @ X4)))))) => ((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_meuclidean,definition,(meuclidean = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))) => ((X1 @ X3) @ X4)))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mpartially_functional,definition,(mpartially_functional = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))) => (X3 = X4)))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mfunctional,definition,(mfunctional = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(~((![X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X4) => (X3 = X4))))))))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mweakly_dense,definition,(mweakly_dense = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~((![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ X5) => (~(((X1 @ X5) @ X3)))))))))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mweakly_connected,definition,(mweakly_connected = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))) => ((~(((~(((X1 @ X3) @ X4))) => (X3 = X4)))) => ((X1 @ X4) @ X3))))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mweakly_directed,definition,(mweakly_directed = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:((~((((X1 @ X2) @ X3) => (~(((X1 @ X2) @ X4)))))) => (~((![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X5) => (~(((X1 @ X4) @ X5)))))))))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mvalid,definition,(mvalid = (!!))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_minvalid,definition,(minvalid = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_msatisfiable,definition,(msatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~((![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mcountersatisfiable,definition,(mcountersatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((!!) @ X1)))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mbox_m,definition,(mbox_m = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(![X3:$i]:(((rel_m @ X2) @ X3) => (X1 @ X3))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(def_mdia_m,definition,(mdia_m = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(mnot @ (mbox_m @ (mnot @ X1)))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(prove,conjecture,(![X1:$i]:((~((~((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (~(((~((~((p @ X2))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel_m @ X2) @ X3) => (q @ X3)))))))))))))) => ((~((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2))))))) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (~((q @ X2))))))))))). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h0,negated_conjecture,(~((![X1:$i]:((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (~(((p @ X2) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel_m @ X2) @ X3) => (q @ X3)))))))))) => ((![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2))) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (~((q @ X2)))))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h1,assumption,(~(((~((![X1:$i]:(((rel_m @ eigen__0) @ X1) => (~(((p @ X1) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (q @ X2)))))))))) => (sP1 => (~(sP9)))))),introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h2,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((rel_m @ eigen__0) @ X1) => (~(((p @ X1) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (q @ X2)))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h3,assumption,(~((sP1 => (~(sP9))))),introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h4,assumption,(~((sP11 => (~((sP8 => sP2)))))),introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h5,assumption,sP11,introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h6,assumption,(sP8 => sP2),introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h7,assumption,(~(sP8)),introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h8,assumption,sP2,introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h9,assumption,sP1,introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(h10,assumption,sP9,introduced(assumption,[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(1,plain,(~(sP1) | sP5),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(2,plain,((~(sP5) | ~(sP11)) | sP8),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(3,plain,$false,inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h9,h10,h7,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0])],[1,2,h5,h7,h9])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(4,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h9,h10])],[h3,3,h9,h10])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(5,plain,(~(sP4) | sP3),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(6,plain,(~(sP2) | sP7),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(7,plain,((~(sP7) | ~(sP3)) | sP10),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(8,plain,(~(sP9) | sP6),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(9,plain,((~(sP6) | ~(sP11)) | ~(sP10)),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(a1,axiom,(mreflexive @ rel_m)). % 0.13/0.38 thf(10,plain,sP4,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[a1]). % 0.13/0.38 thf(11,plain,$false,inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h9,h10,h8,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0])],[5,6,7,8,9,10,h5,h8,h10])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(12,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h9,h10])],[h3,11,h9,h10])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(13,plain,$false,inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h7]),tab_imp(discharge,[h8])],[h6,4,12,h7,h8])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(14,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h5,h6])],[h4,13,h5,h6])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(15,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h4]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h2,14,h4])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(16,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h2,h3])],[h1,15,h2,h3])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(17,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h1]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h0,16,h1])). % 0.13/0.38 thf(0,theorem,(![X1:$i]:((~((~((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (~(((~((~((p @ X2))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel_m @ X2) @ X3) => (q @ X3)))))))))))))) => ((~((~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (p @ X2))))))) => (~((![X2:$i]:(((rel_m @ X1) @ X2) => (~((q @ X2)))))))))),inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[17,h0])). % 0.13/0.38 % SZS output end Proof %------------------------------------------------------------------------------