↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO446^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:48 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.05s 2.30s
% Output   : Refutation 4.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO446^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:51:21 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.18  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.89/0.77  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.66/1.05  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (274ms). 
% 1.66/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.21/1.47  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.21/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.59/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.59/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.59/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.59/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.59/1.70  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.05/2.30  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.05/2.30  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.05/2.30  % Time passed: 1975ms (effective reasoning time: 1226ms)
% 4.05/2.30  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.05/2.30  % Axioms used in derivation (3): a1, a2, a3
% 4.05/2.30  % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 4.05/2.30  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1975 ms resp. 1226 ms w/o parsing
% 4.05/2.36  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mu_type, type, mu: $tType).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mand_decl, type, mand: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mimplies_decl, type, mimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mequiv_decl, type, mequiv: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mreflexive_decl, type, mreflexive: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(msymmetric_decl, type, msymmetric: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mtransitive_decl, type, mtransitive: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(rel_s5_decl, type, rel_s5: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mbox_s5_decl, type, mbox_s5: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mdia_s5_decl, type, mdia_s5: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(p_decl, type, p: ($i > $o)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(q_decl, type, q: ($i > $o)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mand_def, definition, mand = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mor @ (mnot @ A) @ (mnot @ B)))) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mimplies_def, definition, mimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mequiv_def, definition, mequiv = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mand @ (mimplies @ A @ B) @ (mimplies @ B @ A))) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mreflexive_def, definition, mreflexive = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i]: (A @ B @ B)) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(msymmetric_def, definition, msymmetric = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i,C:$i]: ((A @ B @ C) => (A @ C @ B))) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mtransitive_def, definition, mtransitive = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i,C:$i,D:$i]: (((A @ B @ C) & (A @ C @ D)) => (A @ B @ D))) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mbox_s5_def, definition, mbox_s5 = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ B @ C) | (A @ C))) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(mdia_s5_def, definition, mdia_s5 = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mbox_s5 @ (mnot @ A)))) ).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(1,conjecture,((mvalid @ (mequiv @ (mdia_s5 @ (mand @ p @ (mdia_s5 @ q))) @ (mand @ (mdia_s5 @ p) @ (mdia_s5 @ q))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (mvalid @ (mequiv @ (mdia_s5 @ (mand @ p @ (mdia_s5 @ q))) @ (mand @ (mdia_s5 @ p) @ (mdia_s5 @ q)))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(6,plain,((~ (! [A:$i]: ~ (~ (! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ B) | ~ (p @ B) | ! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ B @ C) | ~ (q @ C))) | ~ (! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ B) | ~ (p @ B)) | ! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ B) | ~ (q @ B)))) | ~ (! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ B) | ~ (p @ B)) | ! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ B) | ~ (q @ B)) | ~ (! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ B) | ~ (p @ B) | ! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ B @ C) | ~ (q @ C))))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(3,axiom,((mreflexive @ rel_s5)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(20,plain,((! [A:$i]: (rel_s5 @ A @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(4,axiom,((mtransitive @ rel_s5)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(22,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((rel_s5 @ A @ B) & (rel_s5 @ B @ C)) => (rel_s5 @ A @ C)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(5,axiom,((msymmetric @ rel_s5)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a3)).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(24,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: ((rel_s5 @ A @ B) => (rel_s5 @ B @ A)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5])).
% 4.05/2.36  thf(26,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[6,20,22,24])).
% 4.05/2.36  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.05/2.36  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------