↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO464^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:55 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.57s 2.23s
% Output   : Refutation 3.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SYO464^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.21  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:00:30 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.00/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.46/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (266ms). 
% 1.46/1.09  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.03/1.48  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.03/1.49  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.40/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.59/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.59/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.59/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.59/1.71  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.57/2.23  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.57/2.23  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.57/2.23  % Time passed: 1877ms (effective reasoning time: 1140ms)
% 3.57/2.23  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.57/2.23  % Axioms used in derivation (2): a1, a2
% 3.57/2.23  % No. of inferences in proof: 8
% 3.57/2.23  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1877 ms resp. 1140 ms w/o parsing
% 3.57/2.29  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mu_type, type, mu: $tType).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mand_decl, type, mand: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mimplies_decl, type, mimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mreflexive_decl, type, mreflexive: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(msymmetric_decl, type, msymmetric: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(rel_b_decl, type, rel_b: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mbox_b_decl, type, mbox_b: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mdia_b_decl, type, mdia_b: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(p_decl, type, p: ($i > $o)).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(q_decl, type, q: ($i > $o)).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mand_def, definition, mand = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mor @ (mnot @ A) @ (mnot @ B)))) ).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mimplies_def, definition, mimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mreflexive_def, definition, mreflexive = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i]: (A @ B @ B)) ).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(msymmetric_def, definition, msymmetric = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i,C:$i]: ((A @ B @ C) => (A @ C @ B))) ).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mbox_b_def, definition, mbox_b = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_b @ B @ C) | (A @ C))) ).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(mdia_b_def, definition, mdia_b = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mbox_b @ (mnot @ A)))) ).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(1,conjecture,((mvalid @ (mimplies @ (mbox_b @ (mand @ p @ q)) @ (mbox_b @ (mbox_b @ (mimplies @ (mdia_b @ p) @ (mdia_b @ q))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove)).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (mvalid @ (mimplies @ (mbox_b @ (mand @ p @ q)) @ (mbox_b @ (mbox_b @ (mimplies @ (mdia_b @ p) @ (mdia_b @ q)))))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(5,plain,((~ (! [A:$i]: (~ (! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_b @ A @ B) | ~ (~ (p @ B) | ~ (q @ B)))) | ! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_b @ A @ B) | ! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_b @ B @ C) | ! [D:$i]: (~ (rel_b @ C @ D) | ~ (p @ D)) | ~ (! [D:$i]: (~ (rel_b @ C @ D) | ~ (q @ D))))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(3,axiom,((mreflexive @ rel_b)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1)).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(15,plain,((! [A:$i]: (rel_b @ A @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(4,axiom,((msymmetric @ rel_b)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2)).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(17,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: ((rel_b @ A @ B) => (rel_b @ B @ A)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 3.57/2.29  thf(19,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[5,15,17])).
% 3.57/2.29  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/2.29  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------