%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SYO469^4 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n018.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 19:33:01 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 24.09s % Output : FiniteModel 24.09s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYO469^4 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.00/0.05 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.24 % Computer : n018.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.24 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.24 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.24 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.24 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.24 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.24 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 05:11:19 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.24 % CPUTime: % 24.09/9.93 Nitpicking formula... % 24.09/9.93 Timestamp: 05:11:28 % 24.09/9.93 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 24.09/9.93 able to skip some scopes % 24.09/9.93 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 24.09/9.93 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 24.09/9.93 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 24.09/9.93 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 24.09/9.93 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 24.09/9.93 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 24.09/9.93 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 24.09/9.93 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 24.09/9.93 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 24.09/9.93 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3: % 24.09/9.93 % 24.09/9.93 Skolem constants: % 24.09/9.93 \<lambda>Va. ??.bnd_mbox_b.V = % 24.09/9.93 (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1, i3 := i3) % 24.09/9.93 ??.bnd_mbox_b.V = i3 % 24.09/9.93 ??.bnd_mbox_b.V = i2 % 24.09/9.93 ??.bnd_mvalid.W = i3 % 24.09/9.93 Constants: % 24.09/9.93 bnd_p = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True, i3 := True) % 24.09/9.93 bnd_q = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False, i3 := True) % 24.09/9.93 bnd_rel_b = % 24.09/9.93 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.09/9.93 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := False), % 24.09/9.93 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := True), % 24.09/9.93 i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True, i3 := True)) % 24.09/9.93 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 24.09/9.93 Total time: 564 ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------