↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO481^6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:45:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.38s 2.11s
% Output   : Refutation 3.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO481^6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.20  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:08:46 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.84/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.56/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (253ms). 
% 1.56/1.05  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.13/1.44  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.13/1.45  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.53/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.53/1.66  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.53/1.66  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.53/1.66  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.53/1.67  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.38/2.11  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.38/2.11  % Time passed: 1768ms (effective reasoning time: 1050ms)
% 3.38/2.11  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.38/2.11  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.38/2.11  % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 3.38/2.11  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1768 ms resp. 1050 ms w/o parsing
% 3.65/2.18  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mu_type, type, mu: $tType).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(meq_ind_decl, type, meq_ind: (mu > (mu > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mimplies_decl, type, mimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mforall_ind_decl, type, mforall_ind: ((mu > ($i > $o)) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(rel_s5_decl, type, rel_s5: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mbox_s5_decl, type, mbox_s5: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(sk1_decl, type, sk1: $i).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(sk2_decl, type, sk2: mu).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(sk3_decl, type, sk3: mu).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(sk4_decl, type, sk4: $i).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(meq_ind_def, definition, meq_ind = (^ [A:mu,B:mu,C:$i]: (A = B)) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mimplies_def, definition, mimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mforall_ind_def, definition, mforall_ind = (^ [A:(mu > ($i > $o)),B:$i]: ! [C:mu]: (A @ C @ B)) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(mbox_s5_def, definition, mbox_s5 = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ B @ C) | (A @ C))) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(sk1_def, definition, sk1 = (@+ [A:$i]: ~ (! [B:mu,C:mu]: ((B = C) | ~ (? [D:$i]: (rel_s5 @ A @ D)) | ~ (B = C)))) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(sk2_def, definition, sk2 = (@+ [A:mu]: ~ (! [B:mu]: ((A = B) | ~ (? [C:$i]: (rel_s5 @ sk1 @ C)) | ~ (A = B)))) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(sk3_def, definition, sk3 = (@+ [A:mu]: ~ ((sk2 = A) | ~ (? [B:$i]: (rel_s5 @ sk1 @ B)) | ~ (sk2 = A))) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(sk4_def, definition, sk4 = (@+ [A:$i]: (rel_s5 @ sk1 @ A)) ).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(1,conjecture,((mvalid @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [A:mu]: (mforall_ind @ (^ [B:mu]: (mimplies @ (mnot @ (meq_ind @ A @ B)) @ (mbox_s5 @ (mnot @ (meq_ind @ A @ B)))))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove)).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (mvalid @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [A:mu]: (mforall_ind @ (^ [B:mu]: (mimplies @ (mnot @ (meq_ind @ A @ B)) @ (mbox_s5 @ (mnot @ (meq_ind @ A @ B))))))))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(6,plain,((~ (! [A:$i,B:mu,C:mu]: ((B = C) | ! [D:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ D) | ~ (B = C)))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(7,plain,((~ (! [A:$i,B:mu,C:mu]: ((B = C) | ~ (? [D:$i]: (rel_s5 @ A @ D)) | ~ (B = C))))),inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(8,plain,((~ (sk2 = sk3) & (rel_s5 @ sk1 @ sk4) & (sk2 = sk3))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7])).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(11,plain,((sk2 = sk3)),inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[8])).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(13,plain,((sk3 = sk2)),inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[11])).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(9,plain,((~ (sk2 = sk3))),inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[8])).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(12,plain,((sk3 != sk2)),inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[9])).
% 3.65/2.18  thf(20,plain,(($false)),inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[13,12])).
% 3.65/2.18  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.65/2.18  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------