%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SYO497^6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:46:01 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 5.09s 2.88s
% Output : Refutation 5.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO497^6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.12/0.25 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.25 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.25 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.25 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.25 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:10:18 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.25 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.17/0.97 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 2.06/1.35 % [INFO] Parsing done (380ms).
% 2.06/1.37 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.98/1.82 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.98/1.83 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 3.17/2.03 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 3.48/2.08 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 3.48/2.08 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 3.48/2.09 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 3.48/2.10 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 5.09/2.87 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.09/2.87 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 5.09/2.88 % Time passed: 2467ms (effective reasoning time: 1495ms)
% 5.09/2.88 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.09/2.88 % Axioms used in derivation (3): a1, a2, a3
% 5.09/2.88 % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 5.09/2.88 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2467 ms resp. 1495 ms w/o parsing
% 5.39/2.93 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mu_type, type, mu: $tType).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mand_decl, type, mand: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mimplies_decl, type, mimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mforall_ind_decl, type, mforall_ind: ((mu > ($i > $o)) > ($i > $o))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mexists_ind_decl, type, mexists_ind: ((mu > ($i > $o)) > ($i > $o))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mreflexive_decl, type, mreflexive: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(msymmetric_decl, type, msymmetric: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mtransitive_decl, type, mtransitive: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(rel_s5_decl, type, rel_s5: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mbox_s5_decl, type, mbox_s5: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mdia_s5_decl, type, mdia_s5: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(f_decl, type, f: (mu > ($i > $o))).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mand_def, definition, mand = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mor @ (mnot @ A) @ (mnot @ B)))) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mimplies_def, definition, mimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mforall_ind_def, definition, mforall_ind = (^ [A:(mu > ($i > $o)),B:$i]: ! [C:mu]: (A @ C @ B)) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mexists_ind_def, definition, mexists_ind = (^ [A:(mu > ($i > $o))]: (mnot @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [B:mu]: (mnot @ (A @ B)))))) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mreflexive_def, definition, mreflexive = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i]: (A @ B @ B)) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(msymmetric_def, definition, msymmetric = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i,C:$i]: ((A @ B @ C) => (A @ C @ B))) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mtransitive_def, definition, mtransitive = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i,C:$i,D:$i]: (((A @ B @ C) & (A @ C @ D)) => (A @ B @ D))) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mbox_s5_def, definition, mbox_s5 = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ B @ C) | (A @ C))) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(mdia_s5_def, definition, mdia_s5 = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mbox_s5 @ (mnot @ A)))) ).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(1,conjecture,((mvalid @ (mimplies @ (mand @ (mbox_s5 @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [A:mu]: (mimplies @ (f @ A) @ (mbox_s5 @ (f @ A)))))) @ (mdia_s5 @ (mexists_ind @ (f)))) @ (mbox_s5 @ (mexists_ind @ (f)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove)).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (mvalid @ (mimplies @ (mand @ (mbox_s5 @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [A:mu]: (mimplies @ (f @ A) @ (mbox_s5 @ (f @ A)))))) @ (mdia_s5 @ (mexists_ind @ (f)))) @ (mbox_s5 @ (mexists_ind @ (f))))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(6,plain,((~ (! [A:$i]: (~ (! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ B) | ! [C:mu]: (~ (f @ C @ B) | ! [D:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ B @ D) | (f @ C @ D))))) | ! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ B) | ! [C:mu]: ~ (f @ C @ B)) | ! [B:$i]: (~ (rel_s5 @ A @ B) | ~ (! [C:mu]: ~ (f @ C @ B))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(3,axiom,((mreflexive @ rel_s5)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1)).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(15,plain,((! [A:$i]: (rel_s5 @ A @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(4,axiom,((mtransitive @ rel_s5)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2)).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(17,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((rel_s5 @ A @ B) & (rel_s5 @ B @ C)) => (rel_s5 @ A @ C)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(5,axiom,((msymmetric @ rel_s5)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a3)).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(19,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: ((rel_s5 @ A @ B) => (rel_s5 @ B @ A)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5])).
% 5.39/2.93 thf(21,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[6,15,17,19])).
% 5.39/2.93 % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.39/2.93 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------