%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SYO498^6 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n106.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 19:33:10 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.03s % Output : FiniteModel 23.03s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO498^6 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n106.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.24 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.24 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 05:15:03 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.24 % CPUTime: % 23.03/9.44 Nitpicking formula... % 23.03/9.44 Timestamp: 05:15:12 % 23.03/9.44 The type bnd_mu passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be able to skip % 23.03/9.44 some scopes % 23.03/9.44 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.03/9.44 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.03/9.44 Skipping 5000 scopes. (Consider using "mono" or "merge_type_vars" to prevent % 23.03/9.44 this.) % 23.03/9.44 Batch 1 of 1000: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.03/9.44 card bnd_mu = 1 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.03/9.44 card bnd_mu = 2 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.03/9.44 card bnd_mu = 3 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.03/9.44 card bnd_mu = 4 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.03/9.44 card bnd_mu = 5 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.03/9.44 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.03/9.44 Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_mu = 2 and % 23.03/9.44 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2: % 23.03/9.44 % 23.03/9.44 Skolem constants: % 23.03/9.44 ??.bnd_mbox_s5.V = i1 % 23.03/9.44 ??.bnd_mforall_ind.X = b1 % 23.03/9.44 \<lambda>Xa. ??.bnd_mforall_ind.X = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b2, b2 := b2) % 23.03/9.44 ??.bnd_mvalid.W = i2 % 23.03/9.44 Constants: % 23.03/9.44 bnd_n = % 23.03/9.44 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.03/9.44 (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True), % 23.03/9.44 b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)) % 23.03/9.44 bnd_o = % 23.03/9.44 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.03/9.44 (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True), % 23.03/9.44 b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)) % 23.03/9.44 bnd_rel_s5 = % 23.03/9.44 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.03/9.44 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True), % 23.03/9.44 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True)) % 23.03/9.44 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.03/9.44 Total time: 617 ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------