↑ Up

LEO-II---2.3.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LEO-II---2.3.1
% Problem  : SYO500^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Oct  7 11:08:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  643 ( 140 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (  12 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  326 (  15   ~;  78   |;   0   &; 233   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   2 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_f,type,
    f: $o > $o ).

thf(tp_x,type,
    x: $o ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
    = ( f @ x ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = ( f @ x ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = ( f @ x ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
     != ( f @ x ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
     != ( f @ x ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = ( f @ x ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
          | ( f @ x ) )
      | ~ ( ~ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
          | ~ ( f @ x ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_equal_neg,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = ( f @ x ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_equal_neg,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
          | ( f @ x ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( ~ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
          | ~ ( f @ x ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      | ( f @ x ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      | ~ ( f @ x ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
        = ( f @ x ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(fac_restr,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( f @ x )
        = ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(fac_restr,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
        = ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_equal_neg,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ x )
        = ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_equal_neg,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[20]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[22]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[22]) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true )
    | ( x = $true ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
        = ( f @ x ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(fac_restr,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true )
    | ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[51]) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[51]) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
        = ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm)],[16,13]) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ x )
        = ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm)],[16,13]) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( f @ x )
        = ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(fac_restr,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[57]) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[57]) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true )
    | ( x = $true ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[54]) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[54]) ).

thf(65,plain,
    ( ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[58]) ).

thf(66,plain,
    ( ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[58]) ).

thf(68,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
        = ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm)],[43,16]) ).

thf(70,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
        = ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm)],[43,16]) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( x = $true ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[70]) ).

thf(79,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[68]) ).

thf(80,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(sim,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

thf(81,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(sim,[status(thm)],[79]) ).

thf(87,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
        = ( f @ x ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm)],[44,13]) ).

thf(89,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
        = ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm)],[44,13]) ).

thf(93,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[89]) ).

thf(96,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $false )
    | ( x = $false ) ),
    inference(extuni,[status(esa)],[87]) ).

thf(99,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ ( f @ x ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(sim,[status(thm)],[93]) ).

thf(100,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ x ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( x = $false )
    | ( ( f @ x )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(sim,[status(thm)],[96]) ).

thf(101,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[8,100,99,81,80,66,65,64,63,60,59,53,52,48,44,43,42,41,40,16,13]) ).

thf(102,plain,
    $false,
    inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[101]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO500^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.18  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Oct  6 17:41:06 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.19  Running leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.28  
% 0.10/0.28   No.of.Axioms: 0
% 0.10/0.28  
% 0.10/0.28   Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.10/0.28  
% 0.10/0.28   Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.10/0.28  .
% 0.10/0.28  
% 0.10/0.28  ********************************
% 0.10/0.28  *   All subproblems solved!    *
% 0.10/0.28  ********************************
% 0.10/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:0,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:101,loop_count:10,foatp_calls:4,translation:fof_full)
% 0.10/0.28  
% 0.10/0.28  %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 0.10/0.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.28  
% 0.10/0.28  %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 0.10/0.28  %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 52 ****
% 0.10/0.28  %**** clause counter: 101 ****
% 0.10/0.28  
% 0.10/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:0,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:101,loop_count:10,foatp_calls:4,translation:fof_full)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------