↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYO503^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:54:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.47s 1.38s
% Output   : Refutation 1.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  103 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   9 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  576 ( 119 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  396 ( 161   ~; 161   |;   6   &;  59   @)
%                                         (   9 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  16 usr;  14 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_3,type,
    f: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    g: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    p: ( $o > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    ph1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f252,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f25,f34,f61,f98,f100,f101,f126,f143,f146,f147,f151,f162,f171,f190,f209,f244,f248,f251]) ).

thf(f251,plain,
    ( spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f250]) ).

thf(f250,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f249,f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( b != $true )
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,definition,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ( b = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f249,plain,
    ( ( b = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f224,f93]) ).

thf(f93,plain,
    ( ( sK2 != $true )
    | spl0_10 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f92]) ).

thf(f92,definition,
    ( spl0_10
  <=> ( sK2 = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_10])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f224,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = $true )
    | ( b = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f223]) ).

thf(f223,plain,
    ( ( b != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f218]) ).

thf(f218,plain,
    ( ( b != sK2 )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f56]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( f @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f54]) ).

thf(f54,definition,
    ( spl0_7
  <=> ( $false
      = ( f @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( f @ b )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ b )
      = $true )
    & ( ( p @ g )
     != $true )
    & ( ( g @ a )
      = $true )
    & ( ( f @ a )
      = $true )
    & ( a != b )
    & ( ( g @ b )
      = $true )
    & ( ( p @ f )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( g @ b )
       != $true )
      | ( ( g @ a )
       != $true )
      | ( ( p @ g )
        = $true )
      | ( ( f @ b )
       != $true )
      | ( ( f @ a )
       != $true )
      | ( ( p @ f )
       != $true )
      | ( a = b ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ( a = b )
      | ( ( f @ b )
       != $true )
      | ( ( g @ a )
       != $true )
      | ( ( g @ b )
       != $true )
      | ( ( f @ a )
       != $true )
      | ( ( p @ f )
       != $true )
      | ( ( p @ g )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ( a = b )
      | ~ ( f @ b )
      | ~ ( g @ a )
      | ~ ( g @ b )
      | ~ ( f @ a )
      | ~ ( p @ f )
      | ( p @ g ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( a = b )
      | ~ ( f @ b )
      | ~ ( g @ a )
      | ~ ( g @ b )
      | ~ ( f @ a )
      | ~ ( p @ f )
      | ( p @ g ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( a = b )
    | ~ ( f @ b )
    | ~ ( g @ a )
    | ~ ( g @ b )
    | ~ ( f @ a )
    | ~ ( p @ f )
    | ( p @ g ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iVjheRs3o4/DTF2THF_10596.p',claim) ).

thf(f248,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_9
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f227,f54,f31,f87]) ).

thf(f87,definition,
    ( spl0_9
  <=> ( $false = sK2 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_9])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f31,definition,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> ( b = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f227,plain,
    ( ( $false != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f216]) ).

thf(f216,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( $false != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f156,f56]) ).

thf(f156,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( b = $false )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f31]) ).

thf(f244,plain,
    ( spl0_9
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f243,f54,f27,f87]) ).

thf(f27,definition,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> ( a = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f243,plain,
    ( ( $false = sK2 )
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f233,f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( a != $false )
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f233,plain,
    ( ( $false = sK2 )
    | ( a = $false )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f231]) ).

thf(f231,plain,
    ( ( a != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f214]) ).

thf(f214,plain,
    ( ( a != sK2 )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( f @ a )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f209,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_9
    | ~ spl0_4
    | spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f196,f45,f31,f87]) ).

thf(f45,definition,
    ( spl0_5
  <=> ( $true
      = ( g @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f196,plain,
    ( ( $false != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_4
    | spl0_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f192]) ).

thf(f192,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $false != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_4
    | spl0_5 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f46,f158]) ).

thf(f158,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( g @ $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f9,f33]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( g @ b )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( g @ sK2 ) )
    | spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f45]) ).

thf(f190,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f189]) ).

thf(f189,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f183]) ).

thf(f183,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f29,f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( a = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( a = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( a = $false )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f171,plain,
    ( spl0_10
    | spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f170,f58,f22,f92]) ).

thf(f58,definition,
    ( spl0_8
  <=> ( $false
      = ( g @ sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f170,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = $true )
    | spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f121,f23]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = $true )
    | ( b = $true )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f120]) ).

thf(f120,plain,
    ( ( b != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f114]) ).

thf(f114,plain,
    ( ( b != sK2 )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f60,f9]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( g @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f58]) ).

thf(f162,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f161]) ).

thf(f161,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f155]) ).

thf(f155,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f33,f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( b = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f151,plain,
    ( spl0_9
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f150,f58,f27,f87]) ).

thf(f150,plain,
    ( ( $false = sK2 )
    | spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f130,f28]) ).

thf(f130,plain,
    ( ( a = $false )
    | ( $false = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f128]) ).

thf(f128,plain,
    ( ( a != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f118]) ).

thf(f118,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( a != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f12,f60]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( g @ a )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f147,plain,
    ( spl0_9
    | spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f122,f58,f31,f87]) ).

thf(f122,plain,
    ( ( $false = sK2 )
    | ( b = $false )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f120]) ).

thf(f146,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_9
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f127,f58,f27,f87]) ).

thf(f127,plain,
    ( ( $false != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f111]) ).

thf(f111,plain,
    ( ( $false != sK2 )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f60,f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( g @ $false ) )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f12,f29]) ).

thf(f143,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_10
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f134,f58,f22,f92]) ).

thf(f134,plain,
    ( ( sK2 != $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f117]) ).

thf(f117,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( sK2 != $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f35,f60]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( g @ $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f9,f24]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f125]) ).

thf(f125,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f110]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f60,f47]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( g @ sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f45]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_10
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f70,f54,f22,f92]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ( sK2 != $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f62]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( sK2 != $true )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ $true )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f24]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( spl0_9
    | spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f73,f54,f31,f87]) ).

thf(f73,plain,
    ( ( b = $false )
    | ( $false = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f71]) ).

thf(f71,plain,
    ( ( b != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f64]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ( b != sK2 )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f14]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_9
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f77,f54,f27,f87]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( ( $false != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f63]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( $false != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ $false )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f29]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( spl0_7
    | spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f43,f58,f54]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( f @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( g @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( f @ sK2 )
   != ( g @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    f != g,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( f != g ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( p @ f )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( p @ g )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( spl0_3
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f16,f31,f27]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( b = $false )
    | ( a = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    a != b,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f22,f18]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( b = $true )
    | ( a = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYO503^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:32:45 EST 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.33  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.44  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.17/0.44  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.17/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44  % File     : SYO503^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.17/0.44  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.17/0.44  % Problem  : Tableau with two branches
% 0.17/0.44  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.17/0.44  % English  :
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  % Refs     : [BS09a] Brown & Smolka (2009), Terminating Tableaux for the Ba
% 0.17/0.44  %          : [BS09b] Brown E. & Smolka (2009), Extended First-Order Logic
% 0.17/0.44  %          : [Bro09] Brown E. (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.17/0.44  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.17/0.44  % Names    : Example 3.4 [BS09a]
% 0.17/0.44  %          : basic9 [Bro09]
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.17/0.44  % Rating   : 0.00 v9.0.0, 0.10 v8.2.0, 0.31 v8.1.0, 0.27 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.33 v7.2.0, 0.25 v7.1.0, 0.38 v7.0.0, 0.29 v6.4.0, 0.33 v6.3.0, 0.40 v6.2.0, 0.43 v6.1.0, 0.29 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.40 v5.3.0, 0.60 v5.1.0, 0.80 v5.0.0, 0.60 v4.1.0
% 0.17/0.44  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   0 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
% 0.17/0.44  %            Number of atoms       :   15 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.17/0.44  %            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (  15 avg)
% 0.17/0.44  %            Number of connectives :   17 (   5   ~;   6   |;   0   &;   6   @)
% 0.17/0.44  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.17/0.44  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   9 avg)
% 0.17/0.44  %            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
% 0.17/0.44  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.17/0.44  %            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.17/0.44  %            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)
% 0.17/0.44  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  % Comments : The fragment of simple type theory that restricts equations to
% 0.17/0.44  %            base types and disallows lambda abstraction and quantification is
% 0.17/0.44  %            decidable. This is an example.
% 0.17/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44  thf(a,type,
% 0.17/0.44      a: $o ).
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  thf(b,type,
% 0.17/0.44      b: $o ).
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  thf(c,type,
% 0.17/0.44      c: $o ).
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  thf(f,type,
% 0.17/0.44      f: $o > $o ).
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  thf(g,type,
% 0.17/0.44      g: $o > $o ).
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  thf(p,type,
% 0.17/0.44      p: ( $o > $o ) > $o ).
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  thf(claim,conjecture,
% 0.17/0.44      ( ( a = b )
% 0.17/0.44      | ~ ( f @ a )
% 0.17/0.44      | ~ ( f @ b )
% 0.17/0.44      | ~ ( g @ a )
% 0.17/0.44      | ~ ( g @ b )
% 0.17/0.44      | ~ ( p @ f )
% 0.17/0.44      | ( p @ g ) ) ).
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44  ------------------------
% 1.47/1.35  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.47/1.35  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.47/1.35  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:32:46 EST 2026
% 1.47/1.35  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.47/1.35  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.47/1.35  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.47/1.35  
% 1.47/1.35  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iVjheRs3o4/DTF2DTF10596.p
% See solution above
% 1.47/1.35  ------------------------
% 1.47/1.36  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.47/1.36  thf(a,type,
% 1.47/1.36      a: $o ).
% 1.47/1.36  
% 1.47/1.36  thf(b,type,
% 1.47/1.36      b: $o ).
% 1.47/1.36  
% 1.47/1.36  thf(c,type,
% 1.47/1.36      c: $o ).
% 1.47/1.36  
% 1.47/1.36  thf(f,type,
% 1.47/1.36      f: $o > $o ).
% 1.47/1.36  
% 1.47/1.36  thf(g,type,
% 1.47/1.36      g: $o > $o ).
% 1.47/1.36  
% 1.47/1.36  thf(p,type,
% 1.47/1.36      p: ( $o > $o ) > $o ).
% 1.47/1.36  
% 1.47/1.36  thf(claim,conjecture,
% 1.47/1.36      ( ( a = b )
% 1.47/1.36      | ~ ( f @ a )
% 1.47/1.36      | ~ ( f @ b )
% 1.47/1.36      | ~ ( g @ a )
% 1.47/1.36      | ~ ( g @ b )
% 1.47/1.36      | ~ ( p @ f )
% 1.47/1.36      | ( p @ g ) ) ).
% 1.47/1.36  ------------------------
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10596 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)First to succeed.
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.47/1.38  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_10596
% 1.47/1.38  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_10596
% 1.47/1.38  thf(func_def_3, type, f: $o > $o).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(func_def_4, type, g: $o > $o).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(func_def_5, type, p: ($o > $o) > $o).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(func_def_10, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f252,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    $false),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f25,f34,f61,f98,f100,f101,f126,f143,f146,f147,f151,f162,f171,f190,f209,f244,f248,f251])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f251,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_2 | ~spl0_7 | spl0_10),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f250])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f250,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    $false | (spl0_2 | ~spl0_7 | spl0_10)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f249,f23])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b != $true) | spl0_2),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f22,definition,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_2 <=> (b = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f249,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b = $true) | (~spl0_7 | spl0_10)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f224,f93])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f93,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (sK2 != $true) | spl0_10),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f92])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f92,definition,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_10 <=> (sK2 = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_10])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f224,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (sK2 = $true) | (b = $true) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f223])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f223,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b != sK2) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f218])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f218,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b != sK2) | ($false = $true) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f56])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f56,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = (f @ sK2)) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f54])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f54,definition,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_7 <=> ($false = (f @ sK2))),
% 1.47/1.38    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((f @ b) = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((f @ b) = $true) & ((p @ g) != $true) & ((g @ a) = $true) & ((f @ a) = $true) & (a != b) & ((g @ b) = $true) & ((p @ f) = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~(((g @ b) != $true) | ((g @ a) != $true) | ((p @ g) = $true) | ((f @ b) != $true) | ((f @ a) != $true) | ((p @ f) != $true) | (a = b))),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~((a = b) | ~((f @ b) = $true) | ~((g @ a) = $true) | ~((g @ b) = $true) | ~((f @ a) = $true) | ~((p @ f) = $true) | ((p @ g) = $true))),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~((a = b) | ~(f @ b) | ~(g @ a) | ~(g @ b) | ~(f @ a) | ~(p @ f) | (p @ g))),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~((a = b) | ~(f @ b) | ~(g @ a) | ~(g @ b) | ~(f @ a) | ~(p @ f) | (p @ g))),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.47/1.38    (a = b) | ~(f @ b) | ~(g @ a) | ~(g @ b) | ~(f @ a) | ~(p @ f) | (p @ g)),
% 1.47/1.38    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iVjheRs3o4/DTF2THF_10596.p',claim)).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f248,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~spl0_9 | ~spl0_4 | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f227,f54,f31,f87])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f87,definition,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_9 <=> ($false = sK2)),
% 1.47/1.38    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_9])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f31,definition,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_4 <=> (b = $false)),
% 1.47/1.38    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f227,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false != sK2) | (~spl0_4 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f216])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f216,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = $true) | ($false != sK2) | (~spl0_4 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f156,f56])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f156,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((f @ $false) = $true) | ~spl0_4),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f33])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b = $false) | ~spl0_4),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f31])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f244,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_9 | spl0_3 | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f243,f54,f27,f87])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f27,definition,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_3 <=> (a = $false)),
% 1.47/1.38    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f243,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = sK2) | (spl0_3 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f233,f28])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (a != $false) | spl0_3),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f233,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = sK2) | (a = $false) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f231])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f231,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (a != sK2) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f214])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f214,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (a != sK2) | ($false = $true) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f11])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((f @ a) = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f209,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~spl0_9 | ~spl0_4 | spl0_5),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f196,f45,f31,f87])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f45,definition,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_5 <=> ($true = (g @ sK2))),
% 1.47/1.38    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f196,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false != sK2) | (~spl0_4 | spl0_5)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f192])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f192,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($true != $true) | ($false != sK2) | (~spl0_4 | spl0_5)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f46,f158])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f158,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($true = (g @ $false)) | ~spl0_4),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f9,f33])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((g @ b) = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f46,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($true != (g @ sK2)) | spl0_5),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f45])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f190,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f189])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f189,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    $false | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f183])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f183,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = $true) | (~spl0_1 | ~spl0_3)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f29,f20])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (a = $true) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f18,definition,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_1 <=> (a = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (a = $false) | ~spl0_3),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f171,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_10 | spl0_2 | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f170,f58,f22,f92])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f58,definition,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_8 <=> ($false = (g @ sK2))),
% 1.47/1.38    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f170,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (sK2 = $true) | (spl0_2 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f121,f23])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f121,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (sK2 = $true) | (b = $true) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f120])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f120,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b != sK2) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f114])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f114,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b != sK2) | ($false = $true) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f60,f9])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f60,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = (g @ sK2)) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f58])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f162,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f161])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f161,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    $false | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f155])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f155,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = $true) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_4)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f33,f24])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f151,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_9 | spl0_3 | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f150,f58,f27,f87])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f150,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = sK2) | (spl0_3 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f130,f28])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f130,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (a = $false) | ($false = sK2) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f128])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f128,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (a != sK2) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f118])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f118,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = $true) | (a != sK2) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f12,f60])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((g @ a) = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f147,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_9 | spl0_4 | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f122,f58,f31,f87])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f122,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = sK2) | (b = $false) | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f120])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f146,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~spl0_9 | ~spl0_3 | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f127,f58,f27,f87])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f127,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false != sK2) | (~spl0_3 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f111])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f111,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false != sK2) | ($false = $true) | (~spl0_3 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f60,f37])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($true = (g @ $false)) | ~spl0_3),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f12,f29])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f143,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~spl0_10 | ~spl0_2 | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f134,f58,f22,f92])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f134,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (sK2 != $true) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f117])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f117,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = $true) | (sK2 != $true) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f35,f60])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($true = (g @ $true)) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f9,f24])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f126,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~spl0_5 | ~spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f125])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f125,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    $false | (~spl0_5 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f110])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f110,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = $true) | (~spl0_5 | ~spl0_8)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f60,f47])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f47,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($true = (g @ sK2)) | ~spl0_5),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f45])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f101,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~spl0_10 | ~spl0_2 | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f70,f54,f22,f92])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f70,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (sK2 != $true) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f62])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f62,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (sK2 != $true) | ($false = $true) | (~spl0_2 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f38])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((f @ $true) = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f14,f24])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f100,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_9 | spl0_4 | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f73,f54,f31,f87])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f73,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b = $false) | ($false = sK2) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f71])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f71,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b != sK2) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f64])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f64,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b != sK2) | ($false = $true) | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f14])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f98,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ~spl0_9 | ~spl0_3 | ~spl0_7),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f77,f54,f27,f87])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f77,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false != sK2) | (~spl0_3 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f63])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f63,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = $true) | ($false != sK2) | (~spl0_3 | ~spl0_7)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f56,f36])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((f @ $false) = $true) | ~spl0_3),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f29])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f61,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_7 | spl0_8),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f43,f58,f54])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($false = (f @ sK2)) | ($false = (g @ sK2))),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f41])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((f @ sK2) != (g @ sK2))),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (f != g)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f39])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ($true != $true) | (f != g)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(constrained_superposition,[status(thm)],[f13,f8])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((p @ f) = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    ((p @ g) != $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_3 | spl0_4),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f16,f31,f27])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b = $false) | (a = $false)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (a != b)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    spl0_1 | spl0_2),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f22,f18])).
% 1.47/1.38  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.47/1.38    (b = $true) | (a = $true)),
% 1.47/1.38    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.47/1.38  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_10596
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)------------------------------
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.47/1.38  
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)------------------------------
% 1.47/1.38  % (10693)------------------------------
% 1.47/1.38  % (10692)Success in time 0.017 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------