%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO513^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:44:46 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.07s 0.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 1 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 87 ( 15 ~; 12 |; 5 &; 53 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 21 ( 21 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 1 ^; 9 !; 4 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
epred1_1: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epred2_1: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o ).
thf(choiceo,conjecture,
? [X1: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
! [X2: $o > $o] :
( ? [X3: $o] : ( X2 @ X3 )
=> ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cufLvZg6aj/E---3.1_2787832.p',choiceo) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
! [X2: $o > $o] :
( ? [X3: $o] : ( X2 @ X3 )
=> ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[choiceo]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
( ( ~ ( epred2_1 @ X7 )
| ( epred1_1 @ X7 @ $true ) )
& ( ( epred2_1 @ X7 )
| ( epred1_1 @ X7 @ $false ) )
& ( ~ ( X7 @ ( epred1_1 @ X7 ) )
| ( X7 @ ( epred1_1 @ X7 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( epred1_1 @ X7 @ $false )
| ( X7 @ ( epred1_1 @ X7 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( X7 @ ( epred1_1 @ X7 ) )
| ~ ( epred1_1 @ X7 @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( epred1_1 @ X7 @ $false )
| ~ ( epred1_1 @ X7 @ $true ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
( ( epred1_1 @ X1 @ $true )
| ~ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
( ( epred2_1 @ X1 )
| ( epred1_1 @ X1 @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( epred1_1 @ X1 @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
( ( epred1_1 @ X1 @ ~ $true )
| ( epred1_1 @ X1 @ $true ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
( ( epred1_1 @ X1 @ $true )
| ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
( ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( epred1_1 @ X1 @ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_1
@ ^ [Z0: $o > $o] : ( Z0 @ $true )
@ $true ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO513^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.19 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:13:43 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.24 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cufLvZg6aj/E---3.1_2787832.p
% 0.07/0.27 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.07/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.07/0.27 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % new_ho_10_unif with pid 2787860 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Result found by new_ho_10_unif
% 0.07/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.07/0.27 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.27 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.27 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
% 0.07/0.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2787866 completed with status 10
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 31s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % new_ho_10_unif with pid 2787873 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Result found by new_ho_10_unif
% 0.07/0.27 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.07/0.27 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.27 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.27 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
% 0.07/0.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2787866 completed with status 10
% 0.07/0.27 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 31s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.27 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.27 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.07/0.27
% 0.07/0.27 % Proof found!
% 0.07/0.27 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.27 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.07/0.27 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.07/0.27 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.07/0.27 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.07/0.27 % Processed clauses : 13
% 0.07/0.27 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.07/0.27 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Generated clauses : 13
% 0.07/0.27 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.07/0.27 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Paramodulations : 11
% 0.07/0.27 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.07/0.27 % NegExts : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.07/0.27 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.27 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.27 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.27 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.27 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.27 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.27 % Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.07/0.27 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.07/0.27 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.07/0.27 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.07/0.27 % ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 0.07/0.27 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.07/0.27 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.07/0.27 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.07/0.27 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.07/0.27 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Condensation attempts : 13
% 0.07/0.27 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.07/0.27 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1118
% 0.07/0.27 % Search garbage collected termcells : 82
% 0.07/0.27
% 0.07/0.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.27 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.27 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.27 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.07/0.27 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.07/0.27
% 0.07/0.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.27 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.07/0.27 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.07/0.27 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.07/0.27 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.07/0.27 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------