↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO518^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:46:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.30s 2.56s
% Output   : Refutation 4.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  34 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  13   ~;   2   |;   8   &;  18   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   2 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0   ^;  12   !;   3   ?;  29   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;  14  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( @+[B: $i] : ( B = A ) )
         != A ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( @+[B: $i] : ( B = A ) )
         != A ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $o > $i > $i > $i] :
    ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ $true @ B @ C )
        = B )
      & ( ( A @ $false @ B @ C )
        = C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifi) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $o > $i > $i > $i] :
      ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ $true @ B @ C )
          = B )
        & ( ( A @ $false @ B @ C )
          = C ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $o > $i > $i > $i] :
      ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ $true @ B @ C )
          = B )
        & ( ( A @ $false @ B @ C )
          = C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( @+[C: $i] :
                ( ( $true
                 => ( C = A ) )
                & ( ~ $true
                 => ( C = B ) ) ) )
          = A )
        & ( ( @+[C: $i] :
                ( ( $false
                 => ( C = A ) )
                & ( ~ $false
                 => ( C = B ) ) ) )
          = B ) ),
    inference(instance,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( @+[C: $i] : ( C = A ) )
          = A )
        & ( ( @+[C: $i] : ( C = B ) )
          = B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( @+[B: $i] : ( B = A ) )
          = A )
      & ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( @+[B: $i] : ( B = A ) )
          = A ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( ( @+[A: $i] : ( A = sk1 ) )
     != sk1 )
    | ( ( @+[A: $i] : ( A = sk2 ) )
     != sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( ( @+[A: $i] : ( A = sk1 ) )
     != sk1 )
    | ( ( @+[A: $i] : ( A = sk2 ) )
     != sk2 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3,10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO518^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.20  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:12:30 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.02/0.90  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.42/1.09  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (189ms). 
% 1.42/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.11/1.56  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.11/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.33/1.67  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.50/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.50/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.50/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.50/1.71  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.30/2.56  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.30/2.56  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.30/2.56  % Time passed: 2207ms (effective reasoning time: 1449ms)
% 4.30/2.56  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.30/2.56  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 4.30/2.56  % No. of inferences in proof: 9
% 4.30/2.56  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2207 ms resp. 1449 ms w/o parsing
% 4.61/2.63  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.61/2.63  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------