↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYO530^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:48:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   25
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  19 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  148 (  67 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  289 (  34   ~;  21   |;   2   &; 215   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   71 (  71   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  15 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (   0  !!;  10  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  114 (  41   ^;  57   !;  16   ?; 114   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    eps: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    epsa: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    epsb: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK3: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ? [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 )
     => ( X0 @ ( eps @ X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',choiceax) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ( epsa
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [X1: $i] :
            ? [X2: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',epsad) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ( epsb
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',epsbd) ).

thf(f4,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
     => ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( epsb @ X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
       => ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( epsb @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( epsb
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( epsb
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( epsa @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
       => ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( epsb @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
            ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
            = $true )
       => ( ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( epsb @ X0 ) )
          = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ? [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 )
     => ( X0 @ ( eps @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
          = $true )
     => ( ( X0 @ ( eps @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( epsa
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [X1: $i] :
            ? [X2: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( epsa
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ?? @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $o] :
      ( ! [X1: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
      | ( ( X0 @ ( eps @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ? [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
          = $true )
      & ( ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( epsb @ X0 ) )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( sK0 @ ( epsa @ sK0 ) @ ( epsb @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( epsa
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ?? @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( sK0 @ ( epsa @ sK0 ) @ ( epsb @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( epsb
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ ( epsa @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( X0 @ ( eps @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( epsb
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] : ( eps @ ( Y0 @ ( epsa @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( epsa
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( ?? @ $i @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ~ ( X2 @ Y0 )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ~ ( X2 @ Y0 )
          @ ( eps
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ~ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( ~ ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ~ ( X2
              @ ( eps
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                    ~ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ~ ( X2
              @ ( eps
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                    ~ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X2 @ X1 ) )
      | ( ( X2
          @ ( eps
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ~ ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( epsa @ X1 )
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] :
            ( eps
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( ?? @ $i @ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( epsa @ X1 )
      = ( eps
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( ?? @ $i @ ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ! [X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ~ ( X3 @ Y0 )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ~ ( X3 @ Y0 )
          @ ( eps
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ~ ( ^ [Y1: $i] :
                      ~ ( X3 @ Y1 )
                  @ Y0 ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ! [X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ~ ( X3 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( ~ ( X3
              @ ( eps
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                    ~ ~ ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ! [X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( X3
              @ ( eps
                @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                    ~ ~ ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X3 @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f54]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ! [X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( X3 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( X3
          @ ( eps
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ~ ~ ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f55]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ! [X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X3
          @ ( eps
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( X3 @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f56]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ! [X3: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X3 @ ( eps @ X3 ) ) )
      | ( ( X3 @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f57]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( epsb @ X1 )
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] : ( eps @ ( Y0 @ ( epsa @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( eps @ ( X1 @ ( epsa @ X1 ) ) )
      = ( epsb @ X1 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f100]) ).

thf(f105,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i] : ( ?? @ $i @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i] : ( ?? @ $i @ ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
          @ ( epsa @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f58,f39]) ).

thf(f106,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ?? @ $i @ ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( ?? @ $i @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f105]) ).

thf(f107,plain,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( sK3 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( ( ?? @ $i @ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f106]) ).

thf(f108,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( sK3 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f107]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( eps @ ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f21,f108]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( eps @ ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f121]) ).

thf(f157,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X0 @ ( epsa @ X0 ) @ ( epsb @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f126,f101]) ).

thf(f179,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f18,f157]) ).

thf(f198,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f179]) ).

thf(f219,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(superposition,[],[f198,f19]) ).

thf(f233,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f219]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO530^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.17  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:10:57 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.17  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.20  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.06/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664821)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2259525573:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664826)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664827)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=2005149179:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3747434594:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664830)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=2586308593:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664829)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=2911402203:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664828)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664831)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=1033265226:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664830) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3664821-3664830"...
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664829) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3664821-3664829"...
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664830)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664829)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664827)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664827)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664827)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664827)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.26  % (3664830)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.27  % (3664830)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % (3664830)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.27  % (3664830)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.27  % (3664830)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.27  % (3664830)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.27  % (3664830)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.27  % (3664830)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.27  % (3664830)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 0.21/0.27  % (3664821)Success in time 0.047 s
% 0.21/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------