↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO534^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:46:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.86s 2.14s
% Output   : Refutation 3.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    4 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   0 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  71   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   20 (  20   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (  11   ^;   5   !;  24   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(eps_decl,type,
    eps: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(epsa_decl,type,
    epsa: ( $i > $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(epsb_decl,type,
    epsb: ( $i > $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(epsc_decl,type,
    epsc: ( $i > $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(epsa_def,definition,
    ( epsa
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [B: $i] :
            ? [C: $i,D: $i] : ( A @ B @ C @ D ) ) ) ) ).

thf(epsb_def,definition,
    ( epsb
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $i > $o] :
          ( eps
          @ ^ [B: $i] :
            ? [C: $i] : ( A @ ( epsa @ A ) @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(epsc_def,definition,
    ( epsc
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $i > $o] : ( eps @ ( A @ ( epsa @ A ) @ ( epsb @ A ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i > $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ? [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] : ( A @ B @ C @ D )
     => ( A @ ( epsa @ A ) @ ( epsb @ A ) @ ( epsc @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ? [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] : ( A @ B @ C @ D )
       => ( A @ ( epsa @ A ) @ ( epsb @ A ) @ ( epsc @ A ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ? [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] : ( A @ B @ C @ D )
       => ( A
          @ ( eps
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
              ? [C: $i,D: $i] : ( A @ B @ C @ D ) )
          @ ( eps
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
              ? [C: $i] :
                ( A
                @ ( eps
                  @ ^ [D: $i] :
                    ? [E: $i,F: $i] : ( A @ D @ E @ F ) )
                @ B
                @ C ) )
          @ ( eps
            @ ( A
              @ ( eps
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                  ? [C: $i,D: $i] : ( A @ B @ C @ D ) )
              @ ( eps
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                  ? [C: $i] :
                    ( A
                    @ ( eps
                      @ ^ [D: $i] :
                        ? [E: $i,F: $i] : ( A @ D @ E @ F ) )
                    @ B
                    @ C ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ? [B: $i] : ( A @ B )
     => ( A @ ( eps @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',choiceax) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ? [B: $i] : ( A @ B )
     => ( A @ ( eps @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[4,8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO534^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:13:15 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.90/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.27/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (192ms). 
% 1.27/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.95/1.38  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.95/1.39  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.33/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.33/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.33/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.33/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.33/1.55  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.86/2.13  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.86/2.13  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.86/2.13  % Time passed: 1805ms (effective reasoning time: 1141ms)
% 3.86/2.13  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.86/2.14  % Axioms used in derivation (1): choiceax
% 3.86/2.14  % No. of inferences in proof: 6
% 3.86/2.14  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1805 ms resp. 1141 ms w/o parsing
% 3.86/2.19  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.86/2.19  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------