%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SYO577^7 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v5.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n032.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 19:33:22 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 24.81s % Output : FiniteModel 24.81s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO577^7 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v5.5.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.24 % Computer : n032.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.24 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.24 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.24 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.24 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.24 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.24 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 05:20:34 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.24 % CPUTime: % 24.81/13.82 Nitpicking formula... % 24.81/13.82 Timestamp: 05:20:43 % 24.81/13.82 The type bnd_mu passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be able to skip % 24.81/13.82 some scopes % 24.81/13.82 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 24.81/13.82 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 24.81/13.82 Skipping 5000 scopes. (Consider using "mono" or "merge_type_vars" to prevent % 24.81/13.82 this.) % 24.81/13.82 Batch 1 of 1000: Trying 5 scopes: % 24.81/13.82 card bnd_mu = 1 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 24.81/13.82 card bnd_mu = 2 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 24.81/13.82 card bnd_mu = 3 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 24.81/13.82 card bnd_mu = 4 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 24.81/13.82 card bnd_mu = 5 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 24.81/13.82 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 24.81/13.82 Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_mu = 3 and % 24.81/13.82 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3: % 24.81/13.82 % 24.81/13.82 Skolem constants: % 24.81/13.82 ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V = i1 % 24.81/13.82 ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V = i2 % 24.81/13.82 ??.bnd_mvalid.W = i3 % 24.81/13.82 Constants: % 24.81/13.82 bnd_exists_in_world = % 24.81/13.82 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.81/13.82 (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := True), % 24.81/13.82 b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False, i3 := False), % 24.81/13.82 b3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False, i3 := False)) % 24.81/13.82 bnd_p = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False, i3 := False) % 24.81/13.82 bnd_q = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True, i3 := True) % 24.81/13.82 bnd_rel_s4 = % 24.81/13.82 (\<lambda>x. _) % 24.81/13.82 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False, i3 := False), % 24.81/13.82 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True, i3 := False), % 24.81/13.82 i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := True)) % 24.81/13.82 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 24.81/13.82 Total time: 3.4 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------