↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYO578+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:47:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  116 (  37   ~;  29   |;  39   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  17   !;  17   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals_86,conjecture,
    ( ! [X150] :
        ( k04_buttercup10100(X150)
       => ~ b48_buttercup10098(X150) )
    | ? [X147,X148,X149] :
        ( b48_buttercup10098(X149)
        & ~ k04_buttercup10100(X149)
        & ~ b48_buttercup10098(X148)
        & k04_buttercup10100(X148)
        & b48_buttercup10098(X147)
        & k04_buttercup10100(X147) )
    | ( ? [X146] :
          ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(X146)
          & b48_buttercup10098(X146) )
      & ! [X145] :
          ( k04_buttercup10100(X145)
         => b48_buttercup10098(X145) ) )
    | ( ? [X144] :
          ( ~ b48_buttercup10098(X144)
          & k04_buttercup10100(X144) )
      & ! [X143] :
          ( b48_buttercup10098(X143)
         => k04_buttercup10100(X143) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_86) ).

fof(sos_21,axiom,
    ( ? [X63] :
        ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(X63)
        & b48_buttercup10098(X63) )
    & ! [X62] :
        ( k04_buttercup10100(X62)
       => b48_buttercup10098(X62) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_21) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X150] :
          ( k04_buttercup10100(X150)
         => ~ b48_buttercup10098(X150) )
      | ? [X147,X148,X149] :
          ( b48_buttercup10098(X149)
          & ~ k04_buttercup10100(X149)
          & ~ b48_buttercup10098(X148)
          & k04_buttercup10100(X148)
          & b48_buttercup10098(X147)
          & k04_buttercup10100(X147) )
      | ( ? [X146] :
            ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(X146)
            & b48_buttercup10098(X146) )
        & ! [X145] :
            ( k04_buttercup10100(X145)
           => b48_buttercup10098(X145) ) )
      | ( ? [X144] :
            ( ~ b48_buttercup10098(X144)
            & k04_buttercup10100(X144) )
        & ! [X143] :
            ( b48_buttercup10098(X143)
           => k04_buttercup10100(X143) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals_86]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X150] :
          ( k04_buttercup10100(X150)
         => ~ b48_buttercup10098(X150) )
      | ? [X147,X148,X149] :
          ( b48_buttercup10098(X149)
          & ~ k04_buttercup10100(X149)
          & ~ b48_buttercup10098(X148)
          & k04_buttercup10100(X148)
          & b48_buttercup10098(X147)
          & k04_buttercup10100(X147) )
      | ( ? [X146] :
            ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(X146)
            & b48_buttercup10098(X146) )
        & ! [X145] :
            ( k04_buttercup10100(X145)
           => b48_buttercup10098(X145) ) )
      | ( ? [X144] :
            ( ~ b48_buttercup10098(X144)
            & k04_buttercup10100(X144) )
        & ! [X143] :
            ( b48_buttercup10098(X143)
           => k04_buttercup10100(X143) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ( ? [X63] :
        ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(X63)
        & b48_buttercup10098(X63) )
    & ! [X62] :
        ( k04_buttercup10100(X62)
       => b48_buttercup10098(X62) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sos_21]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X245,X247,X248,X249,X250] :
      ( b48_buttercup10098(esk23_0)
      & k04_buttercup10100(esk23_0)
      & ( ~ b48_buttercup10098(X250)
        | k04_buttercup10100(X250)
        | b48_buttercup10098(X249)
        | ~ k04_buttercup10100(X249)
        | ~ b48_buttercup10098(X248)
        | ~ k04_buttercup10100(X248) )
      & ( k04_buttercup10100(X247)
        | ~ b48_buttercup10098(X247)
        | ~ b48_buttercup10098(esk22_0) )
      & ( k04_buttercup10100(X247)
        | ~ b48_buttercup10098(X247)
        | k04_buttercup10100(esk22_0) )
      & ( b48_buttercup10098(X245)
        | ~ k04_buttercup10100(X245)
        | ~ k04_buttercup10100(esk21_0) )
      & ( b48_buttercup10098(X245)
        | ~ k04_buttercup10100(X245)
        | b48_buttercup10098(esk21_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X177] :
      ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(esk7_0)
      & b48_buttercup10098(esk7_0)
      & ( b48_buttercup10098(X177)
        | ~ k04_buttercup10100(X177) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ b48_buttercup10098(X1)
    | k04_buttercup10100(X1)
    | k04_buttercup10100(esk22_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    b48_buttercup10098(esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ~ k04_buttercup10100(esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ b48_buttercup10098(X1)
    | ~ b48_buttercup10098(esk22_0)
    | k04_buttercup10100(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ k04_buttercup10100(X1)
    | b48_buttercup10098(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    k04_buttercup10100(esk22_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ b48_buttercup10098(X1)
    | k04_buttercup10100(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYO578+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:56:05 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 3078459 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting H----_042_B03_F1_AE_Q4_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3078466 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 86
% 0.13/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 487
% 0.13/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 487
% 0.13/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 202
% 0.13/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 37
% 0.13/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 165
% 0.13/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.13/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.13/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 193
% 0.13/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 159
% 0.13/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 193
% 0.13/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 0.13/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 2
% 0.13/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 163
% 0.13/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 37
% 0.13/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 51
% 0.13/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 75
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 441
% 0.13/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2005
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.13/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1001
% 0.13/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 877
% 0.13/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 30
% 0.13/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 789
% 0.13/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.13/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.13/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 21381
% 0.13/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 3761
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44  % User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.13/0.44  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44  % User time                : 0.051 s
% 0.13/0.44  % System time              : 0.022 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Total time               : 0.073 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------