↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SYO580+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:53:46 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.87s 1.95s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  25   ~;  22   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  13   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals_886,conjecture,
    ( ! [X1056] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X1056)
      <=> k04_buttercup10303(X1056) )
    | ( ! [X1057] :
          ( k04_buttercup10303(X1057)
         => b48_buttercup10305(X1057) )
      & ? [X1058] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X1058)
          & ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1058) ) )
    | ( ! [X1059] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X1059)
         => k04_buttercup10303(X1059) )
      & ? [X1060] :
          ( k04_buttercup10303(X1060)
          & ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1060) ) )
    | ! [X1061] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X1061)
       => ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1061) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_886) ).

fof(sos_320,axiom,
    ( ! [X320] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X320)
       => k04_buttercup10303(X320) )
    & ? [X321] :
        ( k04_buttercup10303(X321)
        & ~ b48_buttercup10305(X321) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_320) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X1056] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X1056)
        <=> k04_buttercup10303(X1056) )
      | ( ! [X1057] :
            ( k04_buttercup10303(X1057)
           => b48_buttercup10305(X1057) )
        & ? [X1058] :
            ( b48_buttercup10305(X1058)
            & ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1058) ) )
      | ( ! [X1059] :
            ( b48_buttercup10305(X1059)
           => k04_buttercup10303(X1059) )
        & ? [X1060] :
            ( k04_buttercup10303(X1060)
            & ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1060) ) )
      | ! [X1061] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X1061)
         => ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1061) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals_886])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ( ! [X320] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X320)
       => k04_buttercup10303(X320) )
    & ? [X321] :
        ( k04_buttercup10303(X321)
        & ~ b48_buttercup10305(X321) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sos_320]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3096,X3098] :
      ( ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk451_0)
        | ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk451_0) )
      & ( b48_buttercup10305(esk451_0)
        | k04_buttercup10303(esk451_0) )
      & ( k04_buttercup10303(esk452_0)
        | ~ b48_buttercup10305(X3096)
        | k04_buttercup10303(X3096) )
      & ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk452_0)
        | ~ b48_buttercup10305(X3096)
        | k04_buttercup10303(X3096) )
      & ( b48_buttercup10305(esk453_0)
        | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X3098)
        | b48_buttercup10305(X3098) )
      & ( ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk453_0)
        | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X3098)
        | b48_buttercup10305(X3098) )
      & b48_buttercup10305(esk454_0)
      & k04_buttercup10303(esk454_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X2442] :
      ( ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X2442)
        | k04_buttercup10303(X2442) )
      & k04_buttercup10303(esk1_0)
      & ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk1_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( b48_buttercup10305(esk453_0)
    | b48_buttercup10305(X1)
    | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    k04_buttercup10303(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( b48_buttercup10305(X1)
    | ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk453_0)
    | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( k04_buttercup10303(X1)
    | ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    b48_buttercup10305(esk453_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk453_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYO580+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 09:12:43 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.87/1.95  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.87/1.95  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.95  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.95  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.87/1.95  % Total time : 1.485s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------