%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO580+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:47:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 81 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 94 ( 29 ~; 26 |; 25 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 sgn 17 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals_886,conjecture,
( ! [X1061] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1061)
=> ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1061) )
| ( ? [X1060] :
( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1060)
& k04_buttercup10303(X1060) )
& ! [X1059] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1059)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X1059) ) )
| ( ? [X1058] :
( ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1058)
& b48_buttercup10305(X1058) )
& ! [X1057] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1057)
=> b48_buttercup10305(X1057) ) )
| ! [X1056] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1056)
<=> k04_buttercup10303(X1056) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_886) ).
fof(sos_320,axiom,
( ? [X321] :
( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X321)
& k04_buttercup10303(X321) )
& ! [X320] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X320)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X320) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_320) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1061] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1061)
=> ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1061) )
| ( ? [X1060] :
( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1060)
& k04_buttercup10303(X1060) )
& ! [X1059] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1059)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X1059) ) )
| ( ? [X1058] :
( ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1058)
& b48_buttercup10305(X1058) )
& ! [X1057] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1057)
=> b48_buttercup10305(X1057) ) )
| ! [X1056] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1056)
<=> k04_buttercup10303(X1056) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals_886]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1061] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1061)
=> ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1061) )
| ( ? [X1060] :
( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1060)
& k04_buttercup10303(X1060) )
& ! [X1059] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1059)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X1059) ) )
| ( ? [X1058] :
( ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1058)
& b48_buttercup10305(X1058) )
& ! [X1057] :
( k04_buttercup10303(X1057)
=> b48_buttercup10305(X1057) ) )
| ! [X1056] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X1056)
<=> k04_buttercup10303(X1056) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( ? [X321] :
( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X321)
& k04_buttercup10303(X321) )
& ! [X320] :
( b48_buttercup10305(X320)
=> k04_buttercup10303(X320) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sos_320]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X1064,X1066] :
( k04_buttercup10303(esk4_0)
& b48_buttercup10305(esk4_0)
& ( b48_buttercup10305(X1066)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1066)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0) )
& ( b48_buttercup10305(X1066)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1066)
| b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0) )
& ( k04_buttercup10303(X1064)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1064)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk2_0) )
& ( k04_buttercup10303(X1064)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1064)
| k04_buttercup10303(esk2_0) )
& ( k04_buttercup10303(esk1_0)
| b48_buttercup10305(esk1_0) )
& ( ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk1_0)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk1_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1069] :
( ~ b48_buttercup10305(esk5_0)
& k04_buttercup10303(esk5_0)
& ( k04_buttercup10303(X1069)
| ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1069) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
k04_buttercup10303(esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
~ b48_buttercup10305(esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1)
| k04_buttercup10303(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
b48_buttercup10305(esk3_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| ~ k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0)
| b48_buttercup10305(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
k04_buttercup10303(esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ k04_buttercup10303(X1)
| b48_buttercup10305(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO580+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:56:26 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % sh5l with pid 1844590 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.13/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.13/0.46 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/0.46 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1844591 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.13/0.46 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/0.46 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.46
% 0.13/0.46 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 886
% 0.13/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 868
% 0.13/0.46 % Initial clauses : 34
% 0.13/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 34
% 0.13/0.46 % Processed clauses : 46
% 0.13/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.13/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 43
% 0.13/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.13/0.46 % Generated clauses : 28
% 0.13/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
% 0.13/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Paramodulations : 28
% 0.13/0.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.13/0.46 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 40
% 0.13/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 22
% 0.13/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.13/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.13/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.13/0.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.13/0.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.13/0.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.13/0.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.13/0.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.13/0.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.13/0.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7116
% 0.13/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 5799
% 0.13/0.46
% 0.13/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.46 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.46 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.46 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.13/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 6056 pages
% 0.13/0.46
% 0.13/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.46 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.13/0.46 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.13/0.46 % Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.13/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 0.13/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------