↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYO580+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:51:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.94s 1.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  136 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  154 (  55   ~;  52   |;  35   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0 sgn  33   !;  14   ?;   7   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f132,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( b48_buttercup10305(X0)
     => b48_buttercup10300(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_132) ).

fof(f320,axiom,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1)
        & k04_buttercup10303(X1) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X0)
       => k04_buttercup10303(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_320) ).

fof(f322,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( k04_buttercup10303(X0)
    <=> b48_buttercup10300(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_322) ).

fof(f886,conjecture,
    ( ! [X5] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X5)
       => ~ k04_buttercup10303(X5) )
    | ( ? [X4] :
          ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X4)
          & k04_buttercup10303(X4) )
      & ! [X3] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X3)
         => k04_buttercup10303(X3) ) )
    | ( ? [X2] :
          ( ~ k04_buttercup10303(X2)
          & b48_buttercup10305(X2) )
      & ! [X1] :
          ( k04_buttercup10303(X1)
         => b48_buttercup10305(X1) ) )
    | ! [X0] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X0)
      <=> k04_buttercup10303(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_886) ).

fof(f887,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X5] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X5)
         => ~ k04_buttercup10303(X5) )
      | ( ? [X4] :
            ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X4)
            & k04_buttercup10303(X4) )
        & ! [X3] :
            ( b48_buttercup10305(X3)
           => k04_buttercup10303(X3) ) )
      | ( ? [X2] :
            ( ~ k04_buttercup10303(X2)
            & b48_buttercup10305(X2) )
        & ! [X1] :
            ( k04_buttercup10303(X1)
           => b48_buttercup10305(X1) ) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X0)
        <=> k04_buttercup10303(X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f886]) ).

fof(f891,plain,
    ( ? [X5] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X5)
        & k04_buttercup10303(X5) )
    & ( ! [X4] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X4)
          | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X4) )
      | ? [X3] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X3)
          & ~ k04_buttercup10303(X3) ) )
    & ( ! [X2] :
          ( k04_buttercup10303(X2)
          | ~ b48_buttercup10305(X2) )
      | ? [X1] :
          ( k04_buttercup10303(X1)
          & ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1) ) )
    & ? [X0] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X0)
      <~> k04_buttercup10303(X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f887]) ).

fof(f893,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1)
        & k04_buttercup10303(X1) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X0)
        | k04_buttercup10303(X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f320]) ).

fof(f894,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X0)
      | b48_buttercup10300(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

fof(f895,plain,
    ( ? [X5] :
        ( b48_buttercup10305(X5)
        & k04_buttercup10303(X5) )
    & ( ! [X4] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X4)
          | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X4) )
      | ? [X3] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X3)
          & ~ k04_buttercup10303(X3) ) )
    & ( ! [X2] :
          ( k04_buttercup10303(X2)
          | ~ b48_buttercup10305(X2) )
      | ? [X1] :
          ( k04_buttercup10303(X1)
          & ~ b48_buttercup10305(X1) ) )
    & ? [X0] :
        ( ( b48_buttercup10305(X0)
          | k04_buttercup10303(X0) )
        & ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X0)
          | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f891]) ).

fof(f896,plain,
    ( b48_buttercup10305(sK3)
    & k04_buttercup10303(sK3)
    & ( ! [X4] :
          ( b48_buttercup10305(X4)
          | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X4) )
      | ( b48_buttercup10305(sK2)
        & ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK2) ) )
    & ( ! [X2] :
          ( k04_buttercup10303(X2)
          | ~ b48_buttercup10305(X2) )
      | ( k04_buttercup10303(sK1)
        & ~ b48_buttercup10305(sK1) ) )
    & ( b48_buttercup10305(sK0)
      | k04_buttercup10303(sK0) )
    & ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(sK0)
      | ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X3,sK2),skolemize(X5,sK3)],[f895]) ).

fof(f898,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ k04_buttercup10303(X0)
        | b48_buttercup10300(X0) )
      & ( ~ b48_buttercup10300(X0)
        | k04_buttercup10303(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f322]) ).

fof(f900,plain,
    ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(sK6)
    & k04_buttercup10303(sK6)
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X0)
        | k04_buttercup10303(X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6]),skolemize(X1,sK6)],[f893]) ).

fof(f907,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( b48_buttercup10305(X4)
      | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X4)
      | b48_buttercup10305(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f896]) ).

fof(f908,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( b48_buttercup10305(X4)
      | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X4)
      | ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f896]) ).

fof(f911,plain,
    ( b48_buttercup10305(sK0)
    | k04_buttercup10303(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f896]) ).

fof(f912,plain,
    ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(sK0)
    | ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f896]) ).

fof(f915,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ b48_buttercup10300(X0)
      | k04_buttercup10303(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f898]) ).

fof(f920,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X0)
      | k04_buttercup10303(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f900]) ).

fof(f921,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(X0)
      | b48_buttercup10300(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f894]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ b48_buttercup10305(sK0)
    | ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f912]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( b48_buttercup10305(sK0)
    | k04_buttercup10303(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f911]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( b48_buttercup10305(X0)
      | ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK2)
      | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f908]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( b48_buttercup10305(sK2)
      | b48_buttercup10305(X0)
      | ~ k04_buttercup10303(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f907]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( k04_buttercup10303(X0)
      | ~ b48_buttercup10300(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f915]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( k04_buttercup10303(X0)
      | ~ b48_buttercup10305(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f920]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( b48_buttercup10300(X0)
      | ~ b48_buttercup10305(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f921]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ( k04_buttercup10303(sK0)
    | ~ b48_buttercup10305(sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ( b48_buttercup10305(sK2)
    | b48_buttercup10305(sK0)
    | ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ( b48_buttercup10305(sK0)
    | ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK2)
    | ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

tcf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
    k04_buttercup10303(sK0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_50,c_70]) ).

tcf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    b48_buttercup10305(sK2),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_50,c_70,c_49,c_74]) ).

tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
    ~ k04_buttercup10303(sK2),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_49,c_75,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_90,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( k04_buttercup10303(X0)
      | ~ b48_buttercup10300(X0) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

tcf(c_92,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( b48_buttercup10300(X0)
      | ~ b48_buttercup10305(X0) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

tcf(c_169,plain,
    b48_buttercup10300(sK2),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_80]) ).

tcf(c_189,plain,
    ~ b48_buttercup10300(sK2),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_84]) ).

tcf(c_190,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_189,c_169]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SYO580+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.41  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.41  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:06:44 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.41  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.48  
% 0.14/0.48  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.48  
% 0.14/0.48  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.22/0.50  % Proving...
% 2.94/1.37  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.94/1.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.94/1.37  
% 2.94/1.37  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.94/1.37  
% 2.94/1.37  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.94/1.37  
% 2.94/1.37  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.94/1.37  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.94/1.37  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.94/1.37  
% 2.94/1.37  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.94/1.37  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_non_horn_non_eq
% 2.94/1.37  % 
% 2.94/1.37  
% 2.94/1.37  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s% 
% 2.94/1.37  
% 2.94/1.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.94/1.37  
% 2.94/1.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.94/1.37  
% 2.94/1.37  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------