%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYO611-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 20:27:30 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 0.61s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SYO611-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0. % 0.04/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 09:10:24 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.52/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.52/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.52/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.52/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s % 0.52/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s % 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.52/0.61 % File : SYO611-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0. % 0.52/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.52/0.61 % Problem : C(1,0) % 0.52/0.61 % Version : Especial. % 0.52/0.61 % English : % 0.52/0.61 % 0.52/0.61 % Refs : [Cer15] Cerna (2015), Advances in Schematic Cut Elimination % 0.52/0.61 % : [EH+16] Ebner et al. (2016), System Description: GAPT 2.0 % 0.52/0.61 % : [Cer17] Cerna (2017), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe % 0.52/0.61 % Source : [Cer17] % 0.52/0.61 % Names : C(1,0) [Cer17] % 0.52/0.61 % 0.52/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.52/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v7.1.0 % 0.52/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR) % 0.52/0.61 % Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 5 neg) % 0.52/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.52/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.52/0.61 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty) % 0.52/0.61 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.52/0.61 % Number of variables : 10 ( 3 sgn) % 0.52/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.52/0.61 % 0.52/0.61 % Comments : % 0.52/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.52/0.61 cnf(sos_01,axiom, % 0.52/0.61 le(A,A) ). % 0.52/0.61 % 0.52/0.61 cnf(sos_02,axiom, % 0.52/0.61 ( ~ le(max(A,B),C) % 0.52/0.61 | le(A,C) ) ). % 0.52/0.61 % 0.52/0.61 cnf(sos_03,axiom, % 0.52/0.61 ( ~ le(max(A,B),C) % 0.52/0.61 | le(B,C) ) ). % 0.52/0.61 % 0.52/0.61 cnf(sos_04,axiom, % 0.52/0.61 eq(f(A),a0) ). % 0.52/0.61 % 0.52/0.61 cnf(sos_05,axiom, % 0.52/0.61 ( ~ eq(f(A0),a0) % 0.52/0.61 | ~ eq(f(A1),a0) % 0.52/0.61 | ~ le(s(A0),A1) ) ). % 0.52/0.61 % 0.52/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.52/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.61 % Proof found % 0.52/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.52/0.61 % SZS output start Proof % 0.52/0.61 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.52/0.61 %VarNum:17(SingletonVarNum:10) % 0.52/0.61 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.52/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.52/0.61 %SharedTerms:1 % 0.52/0.61 [1]P1(x11,x11) % 0.52/0.61 [2]P2(f1(x21),a2) % 0.52/0.61 [3]P1(x31,x32)+~P1(f3(x33,x31),x32) % 0.52/0.61 [4]P1(x41,x42)+~P1(f3(x41,x43),x42) % 0.52/0.61 [5]~P1(f4(x51),x52)+~P2(f1(x52),a2)+~P2(f1(x51),a2) % 0.52/0.61 %EqnAxiom % 0.52/0.61 % 0.52/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.61 cnf(6,plain, % 0.52/0.61 (P1(x61,f3(x62,x61))), % 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3])). % 0.52/0.61 cnf(14,plain, % 0.52/0.61 (P1(x141,f3(x142,f3(x143,x141)))), % 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,3])). % 0.52/0.61 cnf(30,plain, % 0.52/0.61 (~P2(f1(x301),a2)), % 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[14,2,3,5])). % 0.52/0.61 cnf(31,plain, % 0.52/0.61 ($false), % 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,2]), % 0.52/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.52/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.52/0.61 % Total time :0.010000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------