↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYO613-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:48:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  156 (   0 equ; 141 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   23 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  145 (  36 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(sos_05,axiom,
    ( ~ le(s(X11),X12)
    | ~ le(s(X10),X11)
    | ~ le(s(X9),X10)
    | ~ le(s(X8),X9)
    | ~ le(s(X7),X8)
    | ~ le(s(X6),X7)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X6)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X2),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2)
    | ~ eq(f(X12),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X11),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X10),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X9),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X8),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X7),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X6),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X5),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X4),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X3),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X2),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X1),a0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_05) ).

cnf(sos_04,axiom,
    eq(f(X1),a0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_04) ).

cnf(sos_01,axiom,
    le(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_01) ).

cnf(sos_03,axiom,
    ( ~ le(max(X1,X2),X3)
    | le(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_03) ).

cnf(sos_02,axiom,
    ( ~ le(max(X1,X2),X3)
    | le(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_02) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X11),X12)
    | ~ le(s(X10),X11)
    | ~ le(s(X9),X10)
    | ~ le(s(X8),X9)
    | ~ le(s(X7),X8)
    | ~ le(s(X6),X7)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X6)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X2),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2)
    | ~ eq(f(X12),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X11),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X10),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X9),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X8),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X7),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X6),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X5),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X4),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X3),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X2),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X1),a0) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sos_05]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X11),X12)
    | ~ le(s(X10),X11)
    | ~ le(s(X9),X10)
    | ~ le(s(X8),X9)
    | ~ le(s(X7),X8)
    | ~ le(s(X6),X7)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X6)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X2),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2)
    | ~ eq(f(X12),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X11),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X10),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X9),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X8),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X7),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X6),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X5),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X4),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X3),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X2),a0)
    | ~ eq(f(X1),a0) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    eq(f(X1),a0),
    sos_04 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X12),X11)
    | ~ le(s(X11),X10)
    | ~ le(s(X10),X9)
    | ~ le(s(X9),X8)
    | ~ le(s(X8),X7)
    | ~ le(s(X7),X6)
    | ~ le(s(X6),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    le(X1,X1),
    sos_01 ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ le(max(X1,X2),X3)
    | le(X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sos_03]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X11),X10)
    | ~ le(s(X10),X9)
    | ~ le(s(X9),X8)
    | ~ le(s(X8),X7)
    | ~ le(s(X7),X6)
    | ~ le(s(X6),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ le(max(X1,X2),X3)
    | le(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sos_02]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ le(max(X1,X2),X3)
    | le(X2,X3) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X10),X9)
    | ~ le(s(X9),X8)
    | ~ le(s(X8),X7)
    | ~ le(s(X7),X6)
    | ~ le(s(X6),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ le(max(X1,X2),X3)
    | le(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    le(X1,max(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X9),X8)
    | ~ le(s(X8),X7)
    | ~ le(s(X7),X6)
    | ~ le(s(X6),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    le(X1,max(X2,max(X1,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    le(X1,max(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X8),X7)
    | ~ le(s(X7),X6)
    | ~ le(s(X6),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    le(X1,max(max(X1,X2),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X7),X6)
    | ~ le(s(X6),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X6),X5)
    | ~ le(s(X5),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X5),X4)
    | ~ le(s(X4),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X4),X3)
    | ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ le(s(X3),X1)
    | ~ le(s(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ~ le(s(X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO613-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:04:22 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4013518 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FHHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 4013527 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FHHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.11/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 25
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 25
% 0.11/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 10
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 67
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 61
% 0.11/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 67
% 0.11/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 12
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 10
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.11/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 46
% 0.11/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 179
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.11/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.11/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.11/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9
% 0.11/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.11/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1753
% 0.11/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 71
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.031 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------