%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SYO620-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 21 16:05:47 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 4.67s 1.01s % Output : CNFRefutation 4.67s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYO620-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 05:46:29 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N % 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMax. % 0.13/0.37 # % 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 8 Number of unprocessed: 8 % 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.37 # 8 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.37 # No conjectures after preprocessing. Attempting to resurrect them from ax_archive. % 0.13/0.37 # No conjectures. % 0.13/0.37 # There are 8 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.37 # Found 1 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.13/0.37 # 8 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.37 # 7 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.37 # 1 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 4.67/1.01 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 4.67/1.01 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.67/1.01 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.67/1.01 # Begin clausification derivation % 4.67/1.01 % 4.67/1.01 # End clausification derivation % 4.67/1.01 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (le(X1,X1))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (le(X1,X2)|~le(max(X3,X1),X2))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (le(X1,X2)|~le(max(X1,X3),X2))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a0)|~eq(f(X2),a0)|~le(s(X2),X1))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a1)|~eq(f(X2),a1)|~le(s(X2),X1))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (eq(f(X1),a3)|eq(f(X1),a2)|eq(f(X1),a1)|eq(f(X1),a0))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a2)|~eq(f(X2),a2)|~le(s(X2),X1))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a3)|~eq(f(X2),a3)|~le(s(X2),X1))). % 4.67/1.01 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 4.67/1.01 # Begin printing tableau % 4.67/1.01 # Found 5 steps % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (le(max(X11,max(X5,X9)),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))|~le(max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(start_rule)). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~le(max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (le(max(X11,max(X5,X9)),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (le(max(X5,X9),max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (le(X5,max(X10,max(X11,max(X5,X9))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_40, ...])). % 4.67/1.01 # End printing tableau % 4.67/1.01 # SZS output end % 4.67/1.01 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 4.67/1.01 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.67/1.01 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.67/1.01 # Begin clausification derivation % 4.67/1.01 % 4.67/1.01 # End clausification derivation % 4.67/1.01 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (le(X1,X1))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (le(X1,X2)|~le(max(X3,X1),X2))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (le(X1,X2)|~le(max(X1,X3),X2))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a0)|~eq(f(X2),a0)|~le(s(X2),X1))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a1)|~eq(f(X2),a1)|~le(s(X2),X1))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (eq(f(X1),a3)|eq(f(X1),a2)|eq(f(X1),a1)|eq(f(X1),a0))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a2)|~eq(f(X2),a2)|~le(s(X2),X1))). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~eq(f(X1),a3)|~eq(f(X2),a3)|~le(s(X2),X1))). % 4.67/1.01 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 4.67/1.01 # Begin printing tableau % 4.67/1.01 # Found 4 steps % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (le(max(X9,max(X5,X8)),max(X9,max(X5,X8)))), inference(start_rule)). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (le(max(X9,max(X5,X8)),max(X9,max(X5,X8)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (le(max(X5,X8),max(X9,max(X5,X8)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])). % 4.67/1.01 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (le(X5,max(X9,max(X5,X8)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_40, ...])). % 4.67/1.01 # End printing tableau % 4.67/1.01 # SZS output end % 4.67/1.01 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 5.21/1.01 # Child (21056) has found a proof. % 5.21/1.01 % 5.21/1.01 # Proof search is over... % 5.21/1.01 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------