↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYO629-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 20:27:32 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYO629-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 09:31:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.55  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.18/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.18/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.18/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.18/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.18/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.59  % File     : SYO629-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.18/0.59  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.18/0.59  % Problem  : ECSClauseSet1
% 0.18/0.59  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.18/0.59  % English  :
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  % Refs     : [Cer15] Cerna (2015), Advances in Schematic Cut Elimination
% 0.18/0.59  %          : [CL16]  Cerna & Leitsch (2016), Schematic Cut Elimination and
% 0.18/0.59  %          : [EH+16] Ebner et al. (2016), System Description: GAPT 2.0
% 0.18/0.59  %          : [Cer17] Cerna (2017), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.18/0.59  % Source   : [Cer17]
% 0.18/0.59  % Names    : ECSClauseSet1 [Cer17]
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.59  % Rating   : 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.1.0
% 0.18/0.59  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   8 unt;   2 nHn;   7 RR)
% 0.18/0.59  %            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;  10 neg)
% 0.18/0.59  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.18/0.59  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.18/0.59  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.18/0.59  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.18/0.59  %            Number of variables   :   13 (   2 sgn)
% 0.18/0.59  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  % Comments :
% 0.18/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_8_01,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      ~ 'E'(f(A_3),f(g(A_3))) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_0_02,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      iLEQ(A_3,A_3) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_11_03,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      ( ~ 'E'('0',f(A_3))
% 0.18/0.59      | ~ 'E'('0',f(g(A_3)))
% 0.18/0.59      | 'E'(f(A_3),f(g(A_3))) ) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_6_04,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      ( 'E'(s('0'),f(A))
% 0.18/0.59      | 'LE'(f(A),s('0')) ) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_7_05,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      ~ 'LE'(f(A_3),'0') ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_10_06,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      ( ~ 'LE'(f(A_1),s('0'))
% 0.18/0.59      | ~ iLEQ(A_1,B_0)
% 0.18/0.59      | 'E'('0',f(B_0))
% 0.18/0.59      | 'LE'(f(B_0),'0') ) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_1_07,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      ( ~ 'E'(s('0'),f(A_2))
% 0.18/0.59      | ~ 'E'(s('0'),f(g(A_2)))
% 0.18/0.59      | 'E'(f(A_2),f(g(A_2))) ) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_2_08,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      ~ 'LE'(f(g(A_3)),'0') ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_3_09,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      iLEQ(A_3,g(A_3)) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_5_10,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      iLEQ(A_2,g(A_2)) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_4_11,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      ~ 'E'(f(A_2),f(g(A_2))) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  cnf(clause_9_12,axiom,
% 0.18/0.59      iLEQ(A_2,A_2) ).
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.18/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.59  %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.18/0.59  %VarNum:22(SingletonVarNum:9)
% 0.18/0.59  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.18/0.59  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.18/0.59  %SharedTerms:2
% 0.18/0.59  [2]P1(x21,x21)
% 0.18/0.59  [4]P1(x41,f1(x41))
% 0.18/0.59  [5]~P2(f2(x51),a3)
% 0.18/0.59  [8]~P3(f2(x81),f2(f1(x81)))
% 0.18/0.59  [9]P2(f2(x91),f4(a3))+P3(f4(a3),f2(x91))
% 0.18/0.59  [11]P3(f2(x111),f2(f1(x111)))+~P3(a3,f2(x111))+~P3(a3,f2(f1(x111)))
% 0.18/0.59  [12]~P3(f4(a3),f2(x121))+P3(f2(x121),f2(f1(x121)))+~P3(f4(a3),f2(f1(x121)))
% 0.18/0.59  [10]~P1(x102,x101)+~P2(f2(x102),f4(a3))+P3(a3,f2(x101))+P2(f2(x101),a3)
% 0.18/0.59  %EqnAxiom
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.60  cnf(13,plain,
% 0.18/0.60     (P3(f4(a3),f2(x131))+P3(a3,f2(f1(x131)))),
% 0.18/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,4,9,10])).
% 0.18/0.60  cnf(14,plain,
% 0.18/0.60     (P3(a3,f2(f1(x141)))+~P3(f4(a3),f2(f1(x141)))),
% 0.18/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,13,12])).
% 0.18/0.60  cnf(15,plain,
% 0.18/0.60     (P3(a3,f2(f1(x151)))+P2(f2(f1(x151)),f4(a3))),
% 0.18/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,9])).
% 0.18/0.60  cnf(16,plain,
% 0.18/0.60     (P3(a3,f2(f1(x161)))),
% 0.18/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,2,15,10])).
% 0.18/0.60  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.18/0.60     (~P3(a3,f2(x171))),
% 0.18/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,8,11])).
% 0.18/0.60  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.18/0.60     ($false),
% 0.18/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,16]),
% 0.18/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.18/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.60  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------