%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.7
% Problem : SYO632-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 20:27:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYO632-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 09:37:39 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.48/0.60 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 % File :CSE---1.7
% 0.60/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.64 % Transform :cnf
% 0.60/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.60/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 % File : SYO632-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.60/0.64 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.60/0.64 % Problem : NDClauseSet1
% 0.60/0.64 % Version : Especial.
% 0.60/0.64 % English :
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 % Refs : [Cer15] Cerna (2015), Advances in Schematic Cut Elimination
% 0.60/0.64 % : [EH+16] Ebner et al. (2016), System Description: GAPT 2.0
% 0.60/0.64 % : [Cer17] Cerna (2017), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.60/0.64 % Source : [Cer17]
% 0.60/0.64 % Names : NDClauseSet1 [Cer17]
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.60/0.64 % Rating : 0.09 v8.2.0, 0.00 v7.1.0
% 0.60/0.64 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 1 RR)
% 0.60/0.64 % Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% 0.60/0.64 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.60/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.60/0.64 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.60/0.64 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.60/0.64 % Number of variables : 7 ( 6 sgn)
% 0.60/0.64 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 % Comments :
% 0.60/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 cnf(clause_4_01,axiom,
% 0.60/0.64 'LEQ'('AP'('0',K),'AP'(s(s('0')),K)) ).
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 cnf(clause_2_02,axiom,
% 0.60/0.64 'E'(f('AP'(s(s('0')),K)),'0') ).
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 cnf(clause_0_03,axiom,
% 0.60/0.64 'E'(f(B),s('0')) ).
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 cnf(clause_1_04,axiom,
% 0.60/0.64 ( ~ 'E'(f(A_0),'0')
% 0.60/0.64 | ~ 'E'(f(B_0),s('0')) ) ).
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 cnf(clause_3_05,axiom,
% 0.60/0.64 'LEQ'('AP'(s('0'),K),B) ).
% 0.60/0.64
% 0.60/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.64 % Proof found
% 0.60/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.64 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.60/0.64 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.60/0.64 %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:7)
% 0.60/0.64 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.60/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 0.60/0.64 %SharedTerms:3
% 0.60/0.64 [1]P1(f1(x11),f4(a2))
% 0.60/0.64 [3]P2(f3(a2,x31),f3(f4(f4(a2)),x31))
% 0.60/0.64 [4]P1(f1(f3(f4(f4(a2)),x41)),a2)
% 0.60/0.64 [2]P2(f3(f4(a2),x21),x22)
% 0.60/0.65 [5]~P1(f1(x52),f4(a2))+~P1(f1(x51),a2)
% 0.60/0.65 %EqnAxiom
% 0.60/0.65
% 0.60/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.65 cnf(6,plain,
% 0.60/0.65 ($false),
% 0.60/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5]),
% 0.60/0.65 ['proof']).
% 0.60/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.60/0.65 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------