↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYO639+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:51:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.28s 0.60s
% Output   : Saturation 0.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_2ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_10ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ g(X3,X1)
    | ~ f(X3,X1)
    | f(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( g(X1,esk2_0)
    | g(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ f(X1,esk2_0)
    | f(esk2_0,X2)
    | g(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    f(esk2_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( f(esk2_0,X1)
    | g(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    f(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    g(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( f(esk1_0,X2)
    | f(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ f(esk1_0,esk1_0)
    | f(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_9]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ~ f(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SYO639+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:06:49 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.59  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/0.59  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.59  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.59  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 4016701 completed with status 1
% 0.28/0.59  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.28/0.59  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.59  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.59  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.59  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.59  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.59  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.59  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.60  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.60  % SubtermCWHack with pid 4016715 completed with status 1
% 0.28/0.60  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.28/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.60  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.60  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.60  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.60  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.60  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.60  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.60  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.28/0.60  
% 0.28/0.60  % No proof found!
% 0.28/0.60  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.28/0.60  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.28/0.60  % Parsed axioms                        : 1
% 0.28/0.60  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.28/0.60  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.28/0.60  % Processed clauses                    : 11
% 0.28/0.60  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.28/0.60  % ...remaining for further processing  : 10
% 0.28/0.60  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Generated clauses                    : 5
% 0.28/0.60  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.28/0.60  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Paramodulations                      : 5
% 0.28/0.60  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.28/0.60  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.28/0.60  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.28/0.60  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/0.60  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.28/0.60  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/0.60  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.28/0.60  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.28/0.60  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.28/0.60  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.28/0.60  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.28/0.60  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.28/0.60  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.28/0.60  % Current number of processed clauses  : 10
% 0.28/0.60  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.28/0.60  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.60  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.28/0.60  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6
% 0.28/0.60  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.60  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.28/0.60  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.28/0.60  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.28/0.60  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.28/0.60  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 368
% 0.28/0.60  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 44
% 0.28/0.60  
% 0.28/0.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.60  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.28/0.60  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.28/0.60  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.28/0.60  % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.28/0.60  
% 0.28/0.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.60  % User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.28/0.60  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.28/0.60  % Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.28/0.60  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.28/0.60  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------