%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SYO640+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:51:02 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.35s 0.52s
% Output : Saturation 0.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SYO640+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed May 8 17:57:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.35/0.52 % Version: 1.5
% 0.35/0.52 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.35/0.52 % SZS output start Saturation
% 0.35/0.52 fof(itmul0,axiom,((?[Y4]:(?[Y2]:(?[Y1]:((f(Y2,Y1,Y4)&f(Y1,Y2,Y4))&(?[Y3]:((![X1]:(f(Y1,Y1,X1)|(~f(Y1,Y3,X1))))&(~f(Y1,Y3,Y4))))))))&(![X1]:(![X2]:(![X3]:(![X4]:((f(X1,X3,X4)|(~f(X1,X2,X4)))|(~f(X2,X3,X4)))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', itmul0)).
% 0.35/0.52 fof(c0,plain,((?[Y4]:(?[Y2]:(?[Y1]:((f(Y2,Y1,Y4)&f(Y1,Y2,Y4))&(?[Y3]:((![X1]:(f(Y1,Y1,X1)|~f(Y1,Y3,X1)))&~f(Y1,Y3,Y4)))))))&(![X1]:(![X2]:(![X3]:(![X4]:((f(X1,X3,X4)|~f(X1,X2,X4))|~f(X2,X3,X4))))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[itmul0])).
% 0.35/0.52 fof(c1,plain,((?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:((f(X3,X4,X2)&f(X4,X3,X2))&(?[X5]:((![X6]:(f(X4,X4,X6)|~f(X4,X5,X6)))&~f(X4,X5,X2)))))))&(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:((f(X7,X9,X10)|~f(X7,X8,X10))|~f(X8,X9,X10))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.35/0.52 fof(c3,plain,(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:(((f(skolem0002,skolem0003,skolem0001)&f(skolem0003,skolem0002,skolem0001))&((f(skolem0003,skolem0003,X6)|~f(skolem0003,skolem0004,X6))&~f(skolem0003,skolem0004,skolem0001)))&((f(X7,X9,X10)|~f(X7,X8,X10))|~f(X8,X9,X10)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c2,plain,(((f(skolem0002,skolem0003,skolem0001)&f(skolem0003,skolem0002,skolem0001))&((![X6]:(f(skolem0003,skolem0003,X6)|~f(skolem0003,skolem0004,X6)))&~f(skolem0003,skolem0004,skolem0001)))&(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:((f(X7,X9,X10)|~f(X7,X8,X10))|~f(X8,X9,X10))))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c1])).])).
% 0.35/0.52 cnf(c4,plain,f(skolem0002,skolem0003,skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.35/0.52 cnf(c5,plain,f(skolem0003,skolem0002,skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.35/0.52 cnf(c8,plain,f(X15,X14,X12)|~f(X15,X13,X12)|~f(X13,X14,X12),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.35/0.52 cnf(c11,plain,f(X19,skolem0002,skolem0001)|~f(X19,skolem0003,skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c8, c5])).
% 0.35/0.52 cnf(c14,plain,f(skolem0002,skolem0002,skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c11, c4])).
% 0.35/0.52 cnf(c10,plain,f(X18,skolem0003,skolem0001)|~f(X18,skolem0002,skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c8, c4])).
% 0.35/0.52 cnf(c12,plain,f(skolem0003,skolem0003,skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c10, c5])).
% 0.35/0.52 cnf(c6,plain,f(skolem0003,skolem0003,X11)|~f(skolem0003,skolem0004,X11),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.35/0.52 cnf(c7,plain,~f(skolem0003,skolem0004,skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.35/0.52 % SZS output end Saturation
% 0.35/0.52
% 0.35/0.52 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.35/0.52 % Processed clauses : 9
% 0.35/0.52 % Factors computed : 1
% 0.35/0.52 % Resolvents computed: 8
% 0.35/0.52 % Tautologies deleted: 3
% 0.35/0.52 % Forward subsumed : 2
% 0.35/0.52 % Backward subsumed : 0
% 0.35/0.52 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.35/0.52 % User time : 0.162 s
% 0.35/0.52 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.35/0.52 % Total time : 0.179 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------