%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYO641-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:48:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.13s 0.45s
% Output : Saturation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_4ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_13ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
ifeq(f(X1,X2,sK1_notref3_Y1(X1)),true,f(X2,sK1_notref3_Y1(X1),sK1_notref3_Y1(X1)),true) = true,
notref3_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
f(sK3_notref3_Y2,sK2_notref3_Y3,X1) = true,
notref3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
tuple(f(X1,X2,X3),f(X4,X1,X5),f(X2,X6,X7)) != tuple(true,true,true),
c_0_4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
f(sK2_notref3_Y3,sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2)) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
tuple(f(sK2_notref3_Y3,X1,X2),true,f(X1,X3,X4)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
tuple(f(X1,sK3_notref3_Y2,X2),f(X3,X1,X4),true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
tuple(f(X1,sK2_notref3_Y3,X2),f(X3,X1,X4),true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
tuple(true,f(X1,sK2_notref3_Y3,X2),f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),X3,X4)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
tuple(true,f(X1,sK3_notref3_Y2,X2),f(sK2_notref3_Y3,X3,X4)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
tuple(true,true,f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),X1,X2)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
tuple(f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),sK3_notref3_Y2,X1),true,true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
tuple(f(sK2_notref3_Y3,sK3_notref3_Y2,X1),true,true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
tuple(f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),X1,X2),true,f(X1,X3,X4)) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
tuple(f(sK1_notref3_Y1(sK3_notref3_Y2),sK2_notref3_Y3,X1),true,true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
tuple(true,f(X1,sK3_notref3_Y2,X2),true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
tuple(f(sK2_notref3_Y3,sK2_notref3_Y3,X1),true,true) != tuple(true,true,true),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_6]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYO641-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.38 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:07:20 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2526444 completed with status 1
% 0.13/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.45 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2526448 completed with status 1
% 0.13/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.45 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % No proof found!
% 0.13/0.45 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.13/0.45 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.13/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.13/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.13/0.45 % Processed clauses : 23
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.13/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 17
% 0.13/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Generated clauses : 20
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
% 0.13/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Paramodulations : 20
% 0.13/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.13/0.45 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.13/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.13/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.13/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.13/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 448
% 0.13/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.45 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.45 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3376 pages
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.45 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.45 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.13/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------