%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SYO674-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:45:09 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.38s 3.12s
% Output : Refutation 4.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 161 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 17 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 968 ( 128 ~; 132 |; 0 &; 708 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 27 ( 11 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 0 ^; 56 !; 0 ?; 56 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf('E_decl',type,
'E': $i > $i > $o ).
thf(s_decl,type,
s: $i > $i ).
thf('0_decl',type,
'0': $i ).
thf(f_decl,type,
f: $i > $i ).
thf(suc_decl,type,
suc: $i > $i ).
thf(iLEQ_decl,type,
iLEQ: $i > $i > $o ).
thf('LE_decl',type,
'LE': $i > $i > $o ).
thf(z_decl,type,
z: $i ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_126) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_498) ).
thf(27,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(1,axiom,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( F @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ ( B @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ ( F @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_193) ).
thf(15,plain,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( F @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ ( B @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ ( F @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_176) ).
thf(21,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
~ ( '0' @ ( z @ f @ 'LE' ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_204) ).
thf(28,plain,
~ ( '0' @ ( z @ f @ 'LE' ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_493) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_298) ).
thf(17,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ ( F @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_431) ).
thf(32,plain,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ ( F @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_50) ).
thf(34,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ ( B @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( F @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_453) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( F @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ suc @ ( B @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( F @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( E @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( B @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_139) ).
thf(23,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_84) ).
thf(36,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_129) ).
thf(30,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
| ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_281) ).
thf(19,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
| ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
| ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(45,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,27,15,21,28,38,17,32,34,40,23,36,30,19]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYO674-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.46 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.46 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 19:44:46 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.46 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/1.06 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.27/1.30 % [INFO] Parsing done (239ms).
% 1.27/1.32 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.90/1.84 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.90/1.85 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.07/1.95 % [INFO] 14 axioms and no conjecture found.
% 2.31/2.12 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 2.31/2.13 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.31/2.14 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.38/3.12 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.38/3.12 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.38/3.12 % Time passed: 2573ms (effective reasoning time: 1797ms)
% 4.38/3.12 % Axioms used in derivation (14): clause_204, clause_431, clause_498, clause_298, clause_453, clause_50, clause_193, clause_84, clause_139, clause_126, clause_176, clause_281, clause_129, clause_493
% 4.38/3.12 % No. of inferences in proof: 29
% 4.38/3.12 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2573 ms resp. 1797 ms w/o parsing
% 4.69/3.18 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.69/3.18 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------