↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYO683-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:45:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.84s 3.59s
% Output   : Refutation 7.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  189 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives : 1206 ( 146   ~; 152   |;   0   &; 908   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   25 (  11 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   0   ^;  66   !;   0   ?;  66   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf('E_decl',type,
    'E': $i > $i > $o ).

thf('0_decl',type,
    '0': $i ).

thf(f_decl,type,
    f: $i > $i ).

thf(suc_decl,type,
    suc: $i > $i ).

thf(iLEQ_decl,type,
    iLEQ: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(s_decl,type,
    s: $i > $i ).

thf('LE_decl',type,
    'LE': $i > $i > $o ).

thf(z_decl,type,
    z: $i ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( E @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_151) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( E @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_44) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_222) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ ( B @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_442) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ ( B @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_89) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_59) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_29) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_398) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_476) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( E @ suc @ ( B @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_563) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( E @ suc @ ( B @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_443) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ~ ( '0' @ ( z @ f @ 'LE' ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_287) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ~ ( '0' @ ( z @ f @ 'LE' ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_539) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_560) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ suc @ ( E @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( E @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ ( D @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( E @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( C @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( C @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( B @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( D @ suc @ ( C @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( B @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ 'E' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_451) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_547) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ ( A @ suc @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_97) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( '0' @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) )
      | ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ s @ s @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( '0' @ s @ s @ s @ ( A @ f @ 'LE' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(1,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_469) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ suc @ ( A @ suc @ iLEQ ) )
      | ~ ( A @ suc @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) )
      | ~ ( A @ f @ ( '0' @ 'E' ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(57,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[52,46,44,48,50,42,24,21,28,38,32,34,40,26,23,36,30,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO683-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 19:48:11 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.25/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.98/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (317ms). 
% 1.98/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.90/2.10  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.90/2.11  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.13/2.18  % [INFO] 	 18 axioms and no conjecture found. 
% 3.54/2.33  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 3.54/2.34  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.54/2.35  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 6.84/3.59  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 6.84/3.59  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 6.84/3.59  % Time passed: 2968ms (effective reasoning time: 2058ms)
% 6.84/3.59  % Axioms used in derivation (18): clause_469, clause_476, clause_547, clause_442, clause_451, clause_89, clause_97, clause_59, clause_398, clause_44, clause_287, clause_539, clause_443, clause_222, clause_560, clause_151, clause_29, clause_563
% 6.84/3.59  % No. of inferences in proof: 37
% 6.84/3.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2968 ms resp. 2058 ms w/o parsing
% 7.37/3.71  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.37/3.71  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------