↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYO889_16 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:48:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   76 (  26   ~;  21   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn  22   !;  12   ?;  23   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    '$ki_world': $tType ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    '$ki_local_world': '$ki_world' ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    '$ki_accessible': ( '$ki_world' * '$ki_world' ) > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    a: ( $i * '$ki_world' ) > $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    b: ( $i * '$ki_world' ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    '$ki_exists_in_world_$i': ( $i * '$ki_world' ) > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk1_0: '$ki_world' ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk3_2: ( $i * '$ki_world' ) > '$ki_world' ).

tff(verify,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
          ( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
         => ! [X4] :
              ( '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X4)
             => ? [X5: '$ki_world'] :
                  ( b(X5,X4)
                  & '$ki_accessible'(X1,X5) ) ) )
      & ? [X1: '$ki_world'] :
          ( ? [X4] :
              ( ! [X5: '$ki_world'] :
                  ( '$ki_accessible'(X1,X5)
                 => a(X5,X4) )
              & '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X4) )
          & '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1) ) )
   => ? [X1: '$ki_world'] :
        ( ? [X4] :
            ( ? [X5: '$ki_world'] :
                ( b(X5,X4)
                & a(X5,X4)
                & '$ki_accessible'(X1,X5) )
            & '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X4) )
        & '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',verify) ).

tff(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
            ( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
           => ! [X4] :
                ( '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X4)
               => ? [X5: '$ki_world'] :
                    ( b(X5,X4)
                    & '$ki_accessible'(X1,X5) ) ) )
        & ? [X1: '$ki_world'] :
            ( ? [X4] :
                ( ! [X5: '$ki_world'] :
                    ( '$ki_accessible'(X1,X5)
                   => a(X5,X4) )
                & '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X4) )
            & '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1) ) )
     => ? [X1: '$ki_world'] :
          ( ? [X4] :
              ( ? [X5: '$ki_world'] :
                  ( b(X5,X4)
                  & a(X5,X4)
                  & '$ki_accessible'(X1,X5) )
              & '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X4) )
          & '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[verify]) ).

tff(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X8: '$ki_world',X9: '$ki_world',X10,X12: '$ki_world',X13,X14: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ( ~ b(X14,X13)
        | ~ a(X14,X13)
        | ~ '$ki_accessible'(X12,X14)
        | ~ '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X12,X13)
        | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X12) )
      & ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X9)
        | ~ '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X9,X10)
        | b(esk3_2(X9,X10),X10) )
      & ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X9)
        | ~ '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X9,X10)
        | '$ki_accessible'(X9,esk3_2(X9,X10)) )
      & ( a(X8,esk2_0)
        | ~ '$ki_accessible'(esk1_0,X8) )
      & '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(esk1_0,esk2_0)
      & '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk1_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world',X2: '$ki_world',X4] :
      ( ~ b(X2,X4)
      | ~ a(X2,X4)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'(X1,X2)
      | ~ '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X4)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

tcf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

tcf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

tcf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'(esk1_0,X1)
      | a(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

tcf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'(esk1_0,X1)
      | ~ b(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),c_0_6]) ).

tcf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4,X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
      | ~ '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X4)
      | b(esk3_2(X1,X4),X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

tcf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'(esk1_0,esk3_2(X1,esk2_0))
      | ~ '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4,X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
      | ~ '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X4)
      | '$ki_accessible'(X1,esk3_2(X1,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO889_16 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:30:19 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % new_bool_3 with pid 4045292 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.43  % Search class: FHHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 4045297 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.43  % Search class: FHHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.11/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 6
% 0.11/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 10
% 0.11/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.11/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 23
% 0.11/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.11/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 20
% 0.11/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 29
% 0.11/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25
% 0.11/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.11/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 29
% 0.11/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 6
% 0.11/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 4
% 0.11/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.11/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.11/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 16
% 0.11/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.11/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 55
% 0.11/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 52
% 0.11/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.11/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.11/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.11/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1360
% 0.11/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 252
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.43  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.43  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.43  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.43  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.11/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------