↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SYO892_15 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 04:54:08 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.79s 1.32s
% Output   : Proof 4.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem  : SYO892_15 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 07:49:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.63  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.63  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.63  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.63  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.63  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.63  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.63  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.63                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.63  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.64  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.66  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.21/1.07  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/1.07  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/1.11  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/1.11  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/1.11  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/1.11  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/1.11  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.19/1.20  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 3.19/1.20  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 3.19/1.21  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 3.19/1.22  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.19/1.23  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.19/1.24  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.19/1.25  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.19/1.25  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.67/1.25  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.79/1.28  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 3.79/1.32  Prover 3: proved (667ms)
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  Prover 2: proved (668ms)
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  Prover 5: proved (669ms)
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.33  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 3.79/1.33  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 3.79/1.33  Prover 6: stopped
% 3.79/1.33  Prover 0: stopped
% 3.79/1.33  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 3.79/1.33  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 3.79/1.33  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 3.79/1.34  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.79/1.36  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 3.79/1.36  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 3.79/1.36  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 3.79/1.38  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 3.79/1.38  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.79/1.38  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.79/1.39  Prover 4: Found proof (size 14)
% 3.79/1.39  Prover 4: proved (739ms)
% 3.79/1.39  Prover 1: stopped
% 3.79/1.39  Prover 7: stopped
% 3.79/1.40  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.79/1.40  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.79/1.40  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.79/1.40  Prover 10: stopped
% 3.79/1.40  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.79/1.40  Prover 13: stopped
% 3.79/1.42  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.79/1.42  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.79/1.43  Prover 8: stopped
% 3.79/1.43  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.24/1.43  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.24/1.44  Prover 11: stopped
% 4.24/1.44  
% 4.24/1.44  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/1.44  
% 4.24/1.44  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 4.24/1.44  Assumptions after simplification:
% 4.24/1.44  ---------------------------------
% 4.24/1.44  
% 4.24/1.44    ($ki_exists_in_world_$i_cumul)
% 4.93/1.48     ! [v0: $ki_world] :  ! [v1: $ki_world] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0
% 4.93/1.48      |  ~ ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(v0,
% 4.93/1.48          v2) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v1) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4:
% 4.93/1.48        int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & $ki_accessible(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $ki_world] :
% 4.93/1.48     ! [v1: $ki_world] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 4.93/1.48      ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ ($ki_accessible(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 4.93/1.48      $ki_world(v1) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) &
% 4.93/1.48        $ki_exists_in_world_$i(v0, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $ki_world] :  ! [v1:
% 4.93/1.48      $ki_world] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~
% 4.93/1.48      ($ki_accessible(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v1) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ~
% 4.93/1.48      $i(v2) | $ki_exists_in_world_$i(v1, v2) = 0)
% 4.93/1.48  
% 4.93/1.48    (verify)
% 4.93/1.48    $ki_world($ki_local_world) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $ki_world] :
% 4.93/1.48    ($ki_exists_in_world_$i($ki_local_world, v0) = 0 &
% 4.93/1.48      $ki_accessible($ki_local_world, v1) = 0 & $ki_world(v1) & $i(v0) &  ! [v2:
% 4.93/1.48        $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (f(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4:
% 4.93/1.48          int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & $ki_exists_in_world_$i(v1, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v2:
% 4.93/1.48        $ki_world] : ( ~ (f(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v2) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~
% 4.93/1.48          (v3 = 0) & $ki_accessible($ki_local_world, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v2: $i] : (
% 4.93/1.49        ~ ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | f(v1, v2) = 0) &  !
% 4.93/1.49      [v2: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible($ki_local_world, v2) = 0) |  ~
% 4.93/1.49        $ki_world(v2) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & f(v2, v0) = v3)))
% 4.93/1.49  
% 4.93/1.49    (function-axioms)
% 4.93/1.49     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 4.93/1.49    [v3: $ki_world] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (f(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (f(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 4.93/1.49    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 4.93/1.49      $ki_world] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 4.93/1.49      ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 4.93/1.49    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $ki_world] :  ! [v3: $ki_world] : (v1 = v0 |
% 4.93/1.49       ~ ($ki_accessible(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ ($ki_accessible(v3, v2) = v0))
% 4.93/1.49  
% 4.93/1.49  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 4.93/1.49  --------------------------------------------
% 4.93/1.49  $ki_exists_in_world_$i_nonempty, mrel_serial
% 4.93/1.49  
% 4.93/1.49  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 4.93/1.49  ---------------------------------
% 4.93/1.49  
% 4.93/1.49  Begin of proof
% 4.93/1.49  | 
% 4.93/1.49  | ALPHA: ($ki_exists_in_world_$i_cumul) implies:
% 4.93/1.49  |   (1)   ! [v0: $ki_world] :  ! [v1: $ki_world] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 4.93/1.49  |          ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ ($ki_accessible(v0, v1) =
% 4.93/1.49  |            0) |  ~ $ki_world(v1) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ~ $i(v2) |
% 4.93/1.49  |          $ki_exists_in_world_$i(v1, v2) = 0)
% 4.93/1.49  | 
% 4.93/1.49  | ALPHA: (verify) implies:
% 4.93/1.49  |   (2)  $ki_world($ki_local_world)
% 4.93/1.50  |   (3)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $ki_world] :
% 4.93/1.50  |        ($ki_exists_in_world_$i($ki_local_world, v0) = 0 &
% 4.93/1.50  |          $ki_accessible($ki_local_world, v1) = 0 & $ki_world(v1) & $i(v0) &  !
% 4.93/1.50  |          [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (f(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |
% 4.93/1.50  |             ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & $ki_exists_in_world_$i(v1, v2) = v4))
% 4.93/1.50  |          &  ! [v2: $ki_world] : ( ~ (f(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v2) |  ?
% 4.93/1.50  |            [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & $ki_accessible($ki_local_world, v2) =
% 4.93/1.50  |              v3)) &  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(v1, v2) = 0) | 
% 4.93/1.50  |            ~ $i(v2) | f(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v2: $ki_world] : ( ~
% 4.93/1.50  |            ($ki_accessible($ki_local_world, v2) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v2) |  ?
% 4.93/1.50  |            [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & f(v2, v0) = v3)))
% 4.93/1.50  | 
% 4.93/1.50  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 4.93/1.50  |   (4)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 4.93/1.50  |         ! [v3: $ki_world] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (f(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (f(v3, v2) =
% 4.93/1.50  |            v0))
% 4.93/1.50  | 
% 4.93/1.50  | DELTA: instantiating (3) with fresh symbols all_9_0, all_9_1 gives:
% 4.93/1.51  |   (5)  $ki_exists_in_world_$i($ki_local_world, all_9_1) = 0 &
% 4.93/1.51  |        $ki_accessible($ki_local_world, all_9_0) = 0 & $ki_world(all_9_0) &
% 4.93/1.51  |        $i(all_9_1) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (f(all_9_0, v0)
% 4.93/1.51  |            = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) &
% 4.93/1.51  |            $ki_exists_in_world_$i(all_9_0, v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0: $ki_world] : (
% 4.93/1.51  |          ~ (f(v0, all_9_1) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 =
% 4.93/1.51  |              0) & $ki_accessible($ki_local_world, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] : (
% 4.93/1.51  |          ~ ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(all_9_0, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) | f(all_9_0,
% 4.93/1.51  |            v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~
% 4.93/1.51  |          ($ki_accessible($ki_local_world, v0) = 0) |  ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ?
% 4.93/1.51  |          [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & f(v0, all_9_1) = v1))
% 4.93/1.51  | 
% 4.93/1.51  | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 4.93/1.51  |   (6)  $i(all_9_1)
% 4.93/1.51  |   (7)  $ki_world(all_9_0)
% 4.93/1.51  |   (8)  $ki_accessible($ki_local_world, all_9_0) = 0
% 4.93/1.51  |   (9)  $ki_exists_in_world_$i($ki_local_world, all_9_1) = 0
% 4.93/1.51  |   (10)   ! [v0: $ki_world] : ( ~ ($ki_accessible($ki_local_world, v0) = 0) | 
% 4.93/1.51  |           ~ $ki_world(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & f(v0, all_9_1) =
% 4.93/1.51  |             v1))
% 4.93/1.51  |   (11)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ ($ki_exists_in_world_$i(all_9_0, v0) = 0) |  ~
% 4.93/1.51  |           $i(v0) | f(all_9_0, v0) = 0)
% 4.93/1.51  | 
% 4.93/1.51  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_9_0, simplifying with (7), (8) gives:
% 4.93/1.51  |   (12)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & f(all_9_0, all_9_1) = v0)
% 4.93/1.51  | 
% 4.93/1.51  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with $ki_local_world, all_9_0, all_9_1,
% 4.93/1.51  |              simplifying with (2), (6), (7), (8), (9) gives:
% 4.93/1.51  |   (13)  $ki_exists_in_world_$i(all_9_0, all_9_1) = 0
% 4.93/1.51  | 
% 4.93/1.51  | DELTA: instantiating (12) with fresh symbol all_18_0 gives:
% 4.93/1.51  |   (14)   ~ (all_18_0 = 0) & f(all_9_0, all_9_1) = all_18_0
% 4.93/1.51  | 
% 4.93/1.51  | ALPHA: (14) implies:
% 4.93/1.51  |   (15)   ~ (all_18_0 = 0)
% 4.93/1.51  |   (16)  f(all_9_0, all_9_1) = all_18_0
% 4.93/1.51  | 
% 4.93/1.51  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_9_1, simplifying with (6), (13)
% 4.93/1.51  |              gives:
% 4.93/1.51  |   (17)  f(all_9_0, all_9_1) = 0
% 4.93/1.51  | 
% 4.93/1.51  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_18_0, 0, all_9_1, all_9_0, simplifying
% 4.93/1.51  |              with (16), (17) gives:
% 4.93/1.51  |   (18)  all_18_0 = 0
% 4.93/1.51  | 
% 4.93/1.51  | REDUCE: (15), (18) imply:
% 4.93/1.52  |   (19)  $false
% 4.93/1.52  | 
% 4.93/1.52  | CLOSE: (19) is inconsistent.
% 4.93/1.52  | 
% 4.93/1.52  End of proof
% 4.93/1.52  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 4.93/1.52  
% 4.93/1.52  889ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------