↑ Up

E---3.5.1.CSA-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYO911_15 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:49:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.14s 0.63s
% Output   : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_3ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_14ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world',X2: '$ki_world',X3: '$ki_world',X4: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ q(X4)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X4)
      | ~ p(X3)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X3)
      | ~ q(X2)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'(X1,X2)
      | ~ p(X1)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( '$ki_accessible'(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk2_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(esk2_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(esk3_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( '$ki_accessible'(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk2_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(esk2_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(esk3_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk2_0)
    | q(esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world',X2: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X2)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
      | ~ p(X2)
      | ~ q(X1)
      | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk5_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world',X2: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X2)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
      | ~ p(X2)
      | ~ q(X1)
      | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk4_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] : '$ki_accessible'(X1,esk1_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world','$ki_local_world')
      | ~ p(X1)
      | ~ p('$ki_local_world')
      | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]),c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk3_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk5_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_7]),c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk3_0)
    | '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk4_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_11]),c_0_10]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: '$ki_world',X2: '$ki_world',X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X3)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X2)
      | ~ p(X1)
      | ~ p(X3)
      | ~ q(X2)
      | ~ q(esk1_1(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_20]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( '$ki_accessible'(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | q(esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( '$ki_accessible'(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | p(esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk2_0)
    | p(esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(esk3_0)
    | q(esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(esk3_0)
    | p(esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(esk2_0)
    | q(esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(esk2_0)
    | p(esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO911_15 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.56  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.56  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.56  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.56  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.56  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.56  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.56  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.56  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:32:10 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.56  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.56  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.60  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.60  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 963899 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.63  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.14/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.63  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % SubtermCWHack with pid 963903 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.63  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.63  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.63  
% 0.14/0.63  % No proof found!
% 0.14/0.63  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.14/0.63  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.14/0.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Initial clauses                      : 23
% 0.14/0.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.14/0.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 18
% 0.14/0.63  % Processed clauses                    : 37
% 0.14/0.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % ...subsumed                          : 10
% 0.14/0.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 27
% 0.14/0.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.14/0.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Generated clauses                    : 36
% 0.14/0.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 30
% 0.14/0.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 10
% 0.14/0.63  % Paramodulations                      : 36
% 0.14/0.63  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.14/0.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.14/0.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 23
% 0.14/0.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.14/0.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 43
% 0.14/0.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
% 0.14/0.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 23
% 0.14/0.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1753
% 0.14/0.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 175
% 0.14/0.63  
% 0.14/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.63  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.63  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.63  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.14/0.63  
% 0.14/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.63  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.14/0.63  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.63  % Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.14/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------