↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYP117^1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 07:11:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.35s 3.53s
% Output   : Proof 3.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYP117^1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:51:14 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.35/3.53  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/3.53  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A : Type), Eq (i A) fun X => X) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (A : Type) (X : A), Eq (i A X) X)) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #2 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : Type), Eq (Eq (i a) fun X => X) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Type), Eq (i a) fun X => X
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #4 (by argument congruence #[3]): ∀ (a : Type) (a_1 : a), Eq (i a a_1) ((fun X => X) a_1)
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #7 (by betaEtaReduce #[4]): ∀ (a : Type) (a_1 : a), Eq (i a a_1) a_1
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #14 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (A : Type) (X : A), Eq (i A X) X) False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a : Type), Eq (Not (∀ (X : skS.0 0 a), Eq (i (skS.0 0 a) X) X)) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a : Type), Eq (∀ (X : skS.0 0 a), Eq (i (skS.0 0 a) X) X) False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a : Type) (a_1 : skS.0 0 a), Eq (Not (Eq (i (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) (skS.0 1 a a_1))) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a : Type) (a_1 : skS.0 0 a), Eq (Eq (i (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a : Type) (a_1 : skS.0 0 a), Ne (i (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) (skS.0 1 a a_1)
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #20 (by forward demodulation #[19, 7]): ∀ (a : Type) (a_1 : skS.0 0 a), Ne (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 1 a a_1)
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #21 (by eliminate resolved literals #[20]): False
% 3.35/3.53  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------