%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : TIM031_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:53:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 25 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 19 ~; 10 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 8 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn 15 !; 0 ?; 15 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
interval: $tType ).
tff(decl_23,type,
before: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).
tff(decl_35,type,
a: interval ).
tff(decl_36,type,
b: interval ).
tff(decl_37,type,
c: interval ).
tff(decl_38,type,
d: interval ).
tff(decl_39,type,
e: interval ).
tff(decl_40,type,
f: interval ).
tff(decl_41,type,
g: interval ).
tff(decl_42,type,
h: interval ).
tff(goal,conjecture,
before(a,h),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
tff(before_transitive,axiom,
! [X1: interval,X2: interval,X3: interval] :
( ( before(X2,X3)
& before(X1,X2) )
=> before(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/TIM002_0.ax',before_transitive) ).
tff(p7,axiom,
before(g,h),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7) ).
tff(p6,axiom,
before(f,g),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p6) ).
tff(p5,axiom,
before(e,f),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p5) ).
tff(p4,axiom,
before(d,e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4) ).
tff(p3,axiom,
before(c,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3) ).
tff(p2,axiom,
before(b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).
tff(p1,axiom,
before(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).
tff(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ before(a,h),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goal]) ).
tff(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ before(a,h),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
tff(c_0_11,plain,
! [X5: interval,X6: interval,X7: interval] :
( before(X5,X7)
| ~ before(X6,X7)
| ~ before(X5,X6) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[before_transitive])])]) ).
tff(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ before(a,h),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
tcf(c_0_13,plain,
! [X1: interval,X2: interval,X3: interval] :
( ~ before(X2,X3)
| ~ before(X1,X2)
| before(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
tcf(c_0_14,plain,
before(g,h),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[p7]) ).
tcf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ before(a,h),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
tcf(c_0_16,plain,
! [X1: interval] :
( ~ before(X1,g)
| before(X1,h) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
tcf(c_0_17,plain,
before(f,g),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[p6]) ).
tcf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ before(a,g),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
tcf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X1: interval] :
( ~ before(X1,f)
| before(X1,g) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]) ).
tcf(c_0_20,plain,
before(e,f),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[p5]) ).
tcf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ before(a,f),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
tcf(c_0_22,plain,
! [X1: interval] :
( ~ before(X1,e)
| before(X1,f) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]) ).
tcf(c_0_23,plain,
before(d,e),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[p4]) ).
tcf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ before(a,e),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
tcf(c_0_25,plain,
! [X1: interval] :
( ~ before(X1,d)
| before(X1,e) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_23]) ).
tcf(c_0_26,plain,
before(c,d),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[p3]) ).
tcf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ before(a,d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
tcf(c_0_28,plain,
! [X1: interval] :
( ~ before(X1,c)
| before(X1,d) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_26]) ).
tcf(c_0_29,plain,
before(b,c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[p2]) ).
tcf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ before(a,c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
tcf(c_0_31,plain,
! [X1: interval] :
( ~ before(X1,b)
| before(X1,c) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_29]) ).
tcf(c_0_32,plain,
before(a,b),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[p1]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : TIM031_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.54 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.54 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.54 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.54 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.54 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.54 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:37:35 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.54 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.59 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.59 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % sh5l with pid 3131754 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.61 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.61 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.61 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3131757 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.61 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.61 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.61 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.61
% 0.14/0.61 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.61 % Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.14/0.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 27
% 0.14/0.61 % Initial clauses : 10
% 0.14/0.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.14/0.61 % Processed clauses : 35
% 0.14/0.61 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.61 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 0.14/0.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Generated clauses : 39
% 0.14/0.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 38
% 0.14/0.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Paramodulations : 39
% 0.14/0.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.14/0.62 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 35
% 0.14/0.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.14/0.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Negative unit clauses : 21
% 0.14/0.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.14/0.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.14/0.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 26
% 0.14/0.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 151
% 0.14/0.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 623
% 0.14/0.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 41
% 0.14/0.62
% 0.14/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.62 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.62 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.62 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.14/0.62
% 0.14/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.62 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.62 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.62 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------