↑ Up

SPASS+T---2.2.22.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : TIM033_1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 07:17:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.74s 1.04s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    interval(d),
    file('TIM033_1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    interval(c),
    file('TIM033_1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    finishes(d,c),
    file('TIM033_1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ~ finished_by(c,d),
    file('TIM033_1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ interval(U)
    | ~ interval(V)
    | ~ finishes(U,V)
    | finished_by(V,U) ),
    file('TIM033_1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    ( ~ interval(c)
    | ~ finishes(d,c)
    | ~ interval(d) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:11.3,9.0')] ).

cnf(25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[24,2,6,1]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:24.0,24.1,24.2,2.0,6.0,1.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : TIM033_1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.13/0.12  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May  4 18:31:34 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.30/0.47  % Using EUF theory
% 0.74/1.04  
% 0.74/1.04  
% 0.74/1.04  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_22130_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.74/1.04  
% 0.74/1.04  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 0.74/1.04  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.74/1.04  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_22130_n027.cluster.edu 
% 0.74/1.04  SPASS derived 1 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 24 clauses.
% 0.74/1.04  SPASS backtracked 0 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.74/1.04  SPASS allocated 6366 KBytes.
% 0.74/1.04  SPASS spent	0:00:00.01 on the problem.
% 0.74/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.74/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.74/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.74/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.74/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.74/1.04  		0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.74/1.04  		
% 0.74/1.04  
% 0.74/1.04  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_22130_n027.cluster.edu
% See solution above
% 0.74/1.04  
% 0.74/1.04  Formulae used in the proof : fof_d fof_c fof_p3 fof_goal fof_finishes_inverse
% 0.74/1.06  
% 0.74/1.06  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------