↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : TIM034_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:52:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.95s 7.49s
% Output   : Refutation 4.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  150 (   4   ~;   0   |;   8   &; 118   @)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   20 (  19 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0   ^;  32   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(interval_type,type,
    interval: $tType ).

thf(before_decl,type,
    before: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(after_decl,type,
    after: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(meets_decl,type,
    meets: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(met_by_decl,type,
    met_by: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(overlaps_decl,type,
    overlaps: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(overlapped_by_decl,type,
    overlapped_by: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(starts_decl,type,
    starts: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(started_by_decl,type,
    started_by: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(during_decl,type,
    during: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(contains_decl,type,
    contains: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(finishes_decl,type,
    finishes: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(finished_by_decl,type,
    finished_by: interval > interval > $o ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: interval ).

thf(b_decl,type,
    b: interval ).

thf(c_decl,type,
    c: interval ).

thf(d_decl,type,
    d: interval ).

thf(e_decl,type,
    e: interval ).

thf(f_decl,type,
    f: interval ).

thf(g_decl,type,
    g: interval ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval,C: interval] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ before ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ before ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ before ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',before_transitive) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval,C: interval] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ before ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ before ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ before ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    d @ ( c @ during ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3) ).

thf(61,plain,
    d @ ( c @ during ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    b @ ( c @ started_by ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).

thf(60,plain,
    b @ ( c @ started_by ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    b @ ( a @ starts ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

thf(59,plain,
    b @ ( a @ starts ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: interval] :
      ~ ( A @ ( A @ before ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',before_irreflexive) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ! [A: interval] :
      ~ ( A @ ( A @ before ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    d @ ( e @ contains ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4) ).

thf(62,plain,
    d @ ( e @ contains ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ during ) )
    <=> ( A @ ( B @ contains ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',during_inverse) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ contains ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ during ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ during ) )
       => ( A @ ( B @ contains ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ meets ) )
    <=> ( A @ ( B @ met_by ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',meets_metby) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ met_by ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ meets ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ meets ) )
       => ( A @ ( B @ met_by ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    f @ ( g @ finished_by ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p6) ).

thf(64,plain,
    f @ ( g @ finished_by ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    e @ ( f @ finishes ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( e @ ( f @ finishes ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ~ ( e @ ( f @ finishes ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ finishes ) )
    <=> ( A @ ( B @ finished_by ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',finishes_inverse) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ finished_by ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ finishes ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ finishes ) )
       => ( A @ ( B @ finished_by ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    e @ ( f @ finishes ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p5) ).

thf(63,plain,
    e @ ( f @ finishes ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ before ) )
    <=> ( A @ ( B @ after ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',before_after) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ after ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ before ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ before ) )
       => ( A @ ( B @ after ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ starts ) )
    <=> ( A @ ( B @ started_by ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',starts_inverse) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ started_by ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ starts ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ starts ) )
       => ( A @ ( B @ started_by ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ overlaps ) )
    <=> ( A @ ( B @ overlapped_by ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',overlaps_inverse) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: interval,B: interval] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ overlapped_by ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ overlaps ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ overlaps ) )
       => ( A @ ( B @ overlapped_by ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[57,61,60,59,54,62,42,24,64,17,48,63,18,36,30]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : TIM034_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/5.42  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/5.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/5.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/5.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/5.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/5.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/5.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/5.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 20:25:10 UTC 2026
% 0.14/5.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/5.42  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.19/6.01  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.40/6.21  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (206ms). 
% 1.40/6.23  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.09/6.64  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.09/6.65  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.32/6.74  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 14 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.32/6.78  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 14 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.49/6.81  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 2.49/6.82  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.49/6.82  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.95/7.49  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.95/7.49  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.95/7.49  % Time passed: 1924ms (effective reasoning time: 1253ms)
% 3.95/7.49  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.95/7.49  % Axioms used in derivation (14): meets_metby, during_inverse, p3, overlaps_inverse, p2, finishes_inverse, before_irreflexive, p6, starts_inverse, before_after, p4, p5, before_transitive, p1
% 3.95/7.49  % No. of inferences in proof: 32
% 3.95/7.49  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1924 ms resp. 1253 ms w/o parsing
% 4.20/7.55  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.20/7.55  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------