%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : TIM034_1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue May 5 07:17:19 PM UTC 2026 % Result : Theorem 3.93s 1.22s % Output : Proof 5.44s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.11 % Problem : TIM034_1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0. % 0.00/0.12 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.16/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.16/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.16/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.16/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.16/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.16/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.16/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.16/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 4 18:32:36 EDT 2026 % 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.55/0.60 ________ _____ % 0.55/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.55/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.55/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.55/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.55/0.60 (2023-06-19) % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.55/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.55/0.60 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.55/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.55/0.61 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.74/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.74/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.74/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.74/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.74/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.74/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 0.74/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 1.80/1.01 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.61/1.02 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.61/1.05 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.61/1.05 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.61/1.05 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.61/1.06 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.61/1.06 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.32/1.16 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.32/1.16 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.93/1.22 Prover 2: proved (599ms) % 3.93/1.22 Prover 5: proved (588ms) % 3.93/1.22 % 3.93/1.22 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 3.93/1.22 % 3.93/1.22 % 3.93/1.22 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 3.93/1.22 % 3.93/1.22 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 3.93/1.23 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 3.93/1.23 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.93/1.24 Prover 6: stopped % 3.93/1.25 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.93/1.25 Prover 3: stopped % 3.93/1.25 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 3.93/1.25 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 3.93/1.26 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 3.93/1.28 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 3.93/1.28 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 3.93/1.28 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 4.68/1.33 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.68/1.34 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.68/1.35 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.68/1.36 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.68/1.37 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.68/1.37 Prover 0: stopped % 4.68/1.37 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 4.68/1.38 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 4.68/1.40 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.44/1.40 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 5.44/1.41 Prover 7: Found proof (size 4) % 5.44/1.41 Prover 10: Found proof (size 4) % 5.44/1.41 Prover 7: proved (188ms) % 5.44/1.41 Prover 10: proved (160ms) % 5.44/1.41 Prover 8: stopped % 5.44/1.43 Prover 1: stopped % 5.44/1.43 Prover 4: stopped % 5.44/1.44 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.44/1.44 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.44/1.45 Prover 13: stopped % 5.44/1.45 Prover 11: stopped % 5.44/1.45 % 5.44/1.45 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 5.44/1.45 % 5.44/1.45 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 5.44/1.46 Assumptions after simplification: % 5.44/1.46 --------------------------------- % 5.44/1.46 % 5.44/1.46 (goal) % 5.44/1.46 interval(f) & interval(e) & ~ finishes(f, e) % 5.44/1.46 % 5.44/1.46 (p5) % 5.44/1.46 interval(f) & interval(e) & finishes(f, e) % 5.44/1.46 % 5.44/1.46 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 5.44/1.46 -------------------------------------------- % 5.44/1.46 before_after, before_irreflexive, before_transitive, during_inverse, % 5.44/1.46 finishes_inverse, meets_metby, overlaps_inverse, p1, p2, p3, p4, p6, % 5.44/1.46 starts_inverse % 5.44/1.46 % 5.44/1.46 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 5.44/1.46 --------------------------------- % 5.44/1.46 % 5.44/1.46 Begin of proof % 5.44/1.46 | % 5.44/1.46 | ALPHA: (goal) implies: % 5.44/1.46 | (1) ~ finishes(f, e) % 5.44/1.46 | % 5.44/1.46 | ALPHA: (p5) implies: % 5.44/1.46 | (2) finishes(f, e) % 5.44/1.46 | % 5.44/1.47 | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (2) imply: % 5.44/1.47 | (3) $false % 5.44/1.47 | % 5.44/1.47 | CLOSE: (3) is inconsistent. % 5.44/1.47 | % 5.44/1.47 End of proof % 5.44/1.47 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 5.44/1.47 % 5.44/1.47 868ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------