%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : TIM034_1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.O4JHO5PMFQ true
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 07:17:53 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.72s
% Output : Refutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 10 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(interval_type,type,
interval: $tType ).
thf(finishes_type,type,
finishes: interval > interval > $o ).
thf(e_type,type,
e: interval ).
thf(f_type,type,
f: interval ).
thf(p5,axiom,
finishes @ f @ e ).
thf(zip_derived_cl18,plain,
finishes @ f @ e,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[p5]) ).
thf(goal,conjecture,
finishes @ f @ e ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( finishes @ f @ e ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[goal]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl20,plain,
~ ( finishes @ f @ e ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl35,plain,
$false,
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl18,zip_derived_cl20]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : TIM034_1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.O4JHO5PMFQ true
% 0.16/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 4 18:32:51 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.16/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/0.34 % Running in FO mode
% 0.52/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.52/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.52/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.52/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.53/0.72 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.53/0.72 % BCE start: 21
% 0.53/0.72 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.53/0.72 % PE start: 21
% 0.53/0.72 logic: neq
% 0.53/0.72 % PE eliminated: 18
% 0.53/0.72 % done 0 iterations in 0.007s
% 0.53/0.72 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.53/0.72 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.72
% 0.53/0.72
% 0.53/0.72 % Terminating...
% 0.60/0.83 % Runner terminated.
% 0.60/0.84 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------