↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : TIM035_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:33:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   6   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   8   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    interval: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    a: interval ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    b: interval ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    c: interval ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    before: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    after: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_3,type,
    meets: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_4,type,
    met_by: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_5,type,
    overlaps: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_6,type,
    overlapped_by: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_7,type,
    starts: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_8,type,
    started_by: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_9,type,
    during: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_10,type,
    contains: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_11,type,
    finishes: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_12,type,
    finished_by: ( interval * interval ) > $o ).

tff(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0: interval,X1: interval] :
      ( overlaps(X0,X1)
    <=> overlapped_by(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/TIM002_0.ax',overlaps_inverse) ).

tff(f9,axiom,
    overlaps(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

tff(f12,conjecture,
    overlapped_by(b,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

tff(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ overlapped_by(b,a),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f12]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ~ overlapped_by(b,a),
    inference(flattening,[],[f13]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: interval,X1: interval] :
      ( overlaps(X0,X1)
     => overlapped_by(X1,X0) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: interval,X1: interval] :
      ( overlapped_by(X1,X0)
      | ~ overlaps(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: interval,X1: interval] :
      ( overlapped_by(X1,X0)
      | ~ overlaps(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    overlaps(a,b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ~ overlapped_by(b,a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ~ overlaps(a,b),
    inference(resolution,[],[f21,f27]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f28,f24]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : TIM035_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 18:53:48 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.22  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.27  % (623806)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1737550948:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-623806-623815"...
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.27  % (623815)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.20/0.27  % (623806)Success in time 0.038 s
% 0.20/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------