%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : TOP002-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:53:48 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.28s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 8 unt; 2 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(set_theory_6,axiom,
~ element_of_set(X1,empty_set),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',set_theory_6) ).
cnf(lemma_1b_2,negated_conjecture,
~ element_of_collection(empty_set,top_of_basis(f)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1b_2) ).
cnf(topology_generated_40,axiom,
( element_of_set(f11(X2,X1),X1)
| element_of_collection(X1,top_of_basis(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',topology_generated_40) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
~ element_of_set(X1,empty_set),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[set_theory_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ element_of_collection(empty_set,top_of_basis(f)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[lemma_1b_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
~ element_of_set(X1,empty_set),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( element_of_set(f11(X2,X1),X1)
| element_of_collection(X1,top_of_basis(X2)) ),
topology_generated_40 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ element_of_collection(empty_set,top_of_basis(f)),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
element_of_collection(empty_set,top_of_basis(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : TOP002-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.44 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:39:02 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.28/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.28/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.56 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % sh5l with pid 2925174 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.28/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.28/0.56 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.28/0.56 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.56 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2925182 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.28/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.28/0.56 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.28/0.56 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.56 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.28/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.56 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.28/0.56
% 0.28/0.56 % Proof found!
% 0.28/0.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.28/0.56 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/0.56 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.28/0.56 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Initial clauses : 3
% 0.28/0.56 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.28/0.56 % Processed clauses : 4
% 0.28/0.56 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.28/0.56 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % NegExts : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.56 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.56 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.56 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.56 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.56 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.56 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.28/0.56 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.56 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.28/0.56 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/0.56 % Termbank termtop insertions : 67
% 0.28/0.56 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4
% 0.28/0.56
% 0.28/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.56 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.28/0.56 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.28/0.56 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.28/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.28/0.56
% 0.28/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.56 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.28/0.56 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.28/0.56 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.28/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.28/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------