↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : TOP024+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:24:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.73s 2.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   41 (  22 unt;   4 nHn;  38 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   84 (  17 equ;  43 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_67,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_67) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_74,plain,
    ( l1_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_74) ).

cnf(i_0_152,plain,
    ( k6_pre_topc(X1,k3_tex_4(X1,X2)) = k6_pre_topc(X1,X2)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_152) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_143,plain,
    ( k2_pre_topc(X1) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_struct_0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_143) ).

cnf(i_0_94,plain,
    ( v1_tops_1(k2_pre_topc(X1),X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_94) ).

cnf(i_0_146,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_146) ).

cnf(i_0_142,plain,
    r1_tarski(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_142) ).

cnf(i_0_64,plain,
    ( v1_tops_1(X1,X2)
    | k6_pre_topc(X2,X1) != u1_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_64) ).

cnf(i_0_65,plain,
    ( k6_pre_topc(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tops_1(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_65) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_tops_1(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-25b33v60/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_168,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_67 ).

cnf(c_0_169,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_170,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_171,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_172,plain,
    ( l1_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
    i_0_74 ).

cnf(c_0_173,plain,
    ( k6_pre_topc(X1,k3_tex_4(X1,X2)) = k6_pre_topc(X1,X2)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_152 ).

cnf(c_0_174,negated_conjecture,
    ( k3_tex_4(esk1_0,X1) = u1_struct_0(esk1_0)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_168,c_0_169]),c_0_170])]),c_0_171]) ).

cnf(c_0_175,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_176,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_177,plain,
    ( k2_pre_topc(X1) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_struct_0(X1) ),
    i_0_143 ).

cnf(c_0_178,negated_conjecture,
    l1_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_172,c_0_169]) ).

cnf(c_0_179,negated_conjecture,
    ( k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,k3_tex_4(esk1_0,X1)) = k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_173,c_0_169]),c_0_170])]),c_0_171]) ).

cnf(c_0_180,negated_conjecture,
    k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = u1_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_174,c_0_175]),c_0_176])]) ).

cnf(c_0_181,plain,
    ( v1_tops_1(k2_pre_topc(X1),X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
    i_0_94 ).

cnf(c_0_182,negated_conjecture,
    k2_pre_topc(esk1_0) = u1_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_177,c_0_178]) ).

cnf(c_0_183,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_146 ).

cnf(c_0_184,plain,
    r1_tarski(X1,X1),
    i_0_142 ).

cnf(c_0_185,plain,
    ( v1_tops_1(X1,X2)
    | k6_pre_topc(X2,X1) != u1_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2))) ),
    i_0_64 ).

cnf(c_0_186,plain,
    ( k6_pre_topc(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tops_1(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_65 ).

cnf(c_0_187,negated_conjecture,
    k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) = k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_179,c_0_176]),c_0_180]) ).

cnf(c_0_188,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tops_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_181,c_0_169]),c_0_182]) ).

cnf(c_0_189,plain,
    m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_183,c_0_184]) ).

cnf(c_0_190,negated_conjecture,
    ( v1_tops_1(X1,esk1_0)
    | k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,X1) != u1_struct_0(esk1_0)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_185,c_0_169]) ).

cnf(c_0_191,plain,
    k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk2_0) = u1_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_186,c_0_187]),c_0_188]),c_0_189]),c_0_169])]) ).

cnf(c_0_192,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_tops_1(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_193,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_190,c_0_191]),c_0_176])]),c_0_192]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : TOP024+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 05:16:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.73/2.31  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.73/2.31  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.73/2.31  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.73/2.31  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S00FN
% 7.73/2.31  # and selection function MSelectSmallestOrientable.
% 7.73/2.31  #
% 7.73/2.31  # Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 7.73/2.31  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.73/2.31  
% 7.73/2.31  # Proof found!
% 7.73/2.31  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.73/2.31  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.73/2.31  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.73/2.31  
% 7.73/2.31  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.73/2.31  # User time                : 0.051 s
% 7.73/2.31  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.73/2.31  # Total time               : 0.057 s
% 7.73/2.31  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.73/2.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------